News Seized Arms Off Yemen Raise Alarm Over Iran

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Seized Arms Off Yemen Raise Alarm Over Iran
Mar 2nd 2013, 18:37

An Iranian dhow seized off the Yemeni coast was carrying sophisticated Chinese antiaircraft missiles, a development that could signal an escalation of Iran's support to its Middle Eastern proxies, alarming other countries in the region and renewing a diplomatic challenge to the United States.

Some of the weapons that officials said were seized off the coast of Yemen in January, from a dhow seen leaving an Iranian port.

Among the items aboard the dhow, according to a review of factory markings on weapons and their packing crates, were 10 Chinese heat-seeking antiaircraft missiles, most of them manufactured in 2005.

The missiles were labeled QW-1M and bore stencils suggesting that they had been assembled at a factory represented by the state-owned China National Precision Machinery Import and Export Corporation, sanctioned by the United States for transfers of missile technology to Pakistan and Iran.

The Chinese missiles were part of a larger shipment interdicted by American and Yemeni forces in January, which American and Yemeni officials say was intended for the Houthi rebels in northwestern Yemen. But the presence of the missiles in the seized contraband complicates an already politically delicate case.

The shipment, which officials portray as an attempt to introduce sophisticated new antiaircraft systems into the Arabian Peninsula, has raised concerns in Saudi Arabia, Oman and Yemen, as the weapons would have posed escalated risks to civilian and military aircraft alike.

And it has presented the Obama administration with a fresh example of Iran's apparent transfer of modern missiles from China to insurgents in the larger regional contest between Sunni-led and Shiite-led states, in which the American military has often been entwined.

The United States has previously accused Iran, a Shiite-led theocracy, of sending weapons to the Houthis, who follow an offshoot of Shiite Islam. Saudi Arabia, an American ally, is considered the leading Sunni power in the region. Both sides have aided and equipped groups or governments they deem aligned with their interests, helping to fuel violence in Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian territories, Sudan and elsewhere.

Iran has rejected the allegations as "baseless and absurd." Neither the Iranian government nor the Chinese firm that markets QW missiles answered written requests for comment.

The government of Yemen has asked the United Nations to investigate the shipment and report the findings to the Security Council. Yemeni news media reported that United Nations experts were in Yemen last week.

The analysis of the weapons' markings and origins was based on photographs taken when Yemeni officials briefly displayed the weapons to journalists.

Concerns over sophisticated Chinese missiles reaching Iran's proxies have considerable regional history. They are part of both the larger worries over antiaircraft weapons set loose by conflicts across the Middle East in the past decade and the lingering frustration in Washington over China's military aid to Iran.

In 2008, late in the Bush administration, the United States complained to China about two similar antiaircraft missiles that were recovered from Shiite militants in Iraq, according a diplomatic cable made public by WikiLeaks.

"We have demarched China repeatedly on its conventional arms transfers to Iran, urging Beijing to stop," the cable noted.

The cable said the QW-1 missiles recovered in Iraq had been manufactured in China in 2003.

Like the American-made Stinger, China's QW series is part of a class of weapons known as man-portable air-defense systems, or manpads. The cable instructed American diplomats to warn China of the "unacceptably high risk that any military equipment sold to Iran, especially weapons like manpads, that are highly sought-after by terrorists, will be diverted to nonstate actors who threaten U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as civilians across the region."

The latest discovery of Chinese manpads came after the United States Navy detected the dhow, the Jeehan 1, as it took on cargo in an Iranian military-controlled port. The vessel then embarked on a high-seas smuggling run, according to accounts by Yemeni and American officials.

The vessel tied off on a pier in the harbor on Lesser Tunb Island, a tiny spit of land just west of the Strait of Hormuz that is claimed by both Iran and the United Arab Emirates, officials familiar with its voyage said. The island is occupied by Iran's Revolutionary Guards.

After passing eastward through the strait and heading south along the Arabian Peninsula, the dhow was stopped on Jan. 23 by the American destroyer Farragut and a Yemeni boarding team off the coast of Al Ghaydah.

The dhow's Iranian crew initially insisted the vessel was Panamanian-flagged and carried only fuel, an American official said. The military cargo, which included many ammunition crates that had been painted over with white or black paint, was found in hidden compartments, American officials said.

That cargo also included 316,000 cartridges for Kalashnikov rifles, nearly 63,000 cartridges for PK machine guns or the Dragunov series of sniper rifles, more than 12,000 cartridges for 12.7-millimeter DShK machine guns and 95 RPG-7 launchers.

The rifle cartridges were packaged in crates strongly resembling packaging used by Iran's Defense Industries Organization, another firm under American sanction, according to James Bevan, director of Conflict Armament Research, a private arms-tracking firm that has documented the spread of Iranian ammunition in East and West Africa.

The vessel also carried 10 SA-7 shoulder-fired antiaircraft missiles with two gripstocks for firing them, nearly 17,000 sticks of Iranian-made C-4 plastic explosives, 48 Russian PN-14K night vision goggles, and 10 LH80A laser range finders made, according to their placards, by the state-run Iran Electronics Industries, also under American sanction.

The original provenance of the SA-7s was not clear, though the crates they were in had stenciling in Bulgarian.

The captain and crew of the Jeehan 1 remain in Yemeni detention, and the dhow has been impounded under Yemeni custody, a Yememi official said.

An American official called the shipment "deeply disturbing" and said it "clearly appeared to violate" Security Council resolutions prohibiting Iran from exporting arms.

Two independent arms-trafficking researchers who have reviewed photographs and written a summary of the markings on the missiles and crates said the weapons appeared to be of Chinese origin.

Matthew Schroeder, an analyst for the Federation of American Scientists in Washington and the Small Arms Survey in Geneva, said that this was the first time to his knowledge that the QW-1M had left state control.

"If so, and these missiles were indeed bound for insurgents, this shipment is extremely worrisome, both from a regional security and a global counterterrorism perspective," he said.

Unlike many older shoulder-fired antiaircraft missiles seen in insurgent hands around the world, the QW-1M is believed by analysts to have a seeker head more resistant to countermeasures intended to deceive it.

A version of this article appeared in print on March 3, 2013, on page A14 of the New York edition with the headline: Seized Chinese Weapons Raise Concerns on Iran .

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

News England Develops a Voracious Appetite for a New Diet

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
England Develops a Voracious Appetite for a New Diet
Mar 2nd 2013, 17:05

LONDON — Visitors to England right now, be warned. The big topic on people's minds — from cabdrivers to corporate executives — is not Kate Middleton's increasingly visible baby bump (though the craze does involve the size of one's waistline), but rather a best-selling diet book that has sent the British into a fasting frenzy.

Dr. Michael Mosley, a co-author of "The Fast Diet," cooking a frittata of mushrooms and scallions at home last week. He researched the science of the diet and its health benefits by putting himself through a regimen of intermittent fasting and filming it for a documentary.

"The Fast Diet," written by Dr. Mosley and Mimi Spencer, has held the No. 1 slot on Amazon's British site nearly every day since its publication in January.

"The Fast Diet," published in mid-January in Britain, could do the same in the United States if Americans eat it up. The United States edition arrived last week.

The book has held the No. 1 slot on Amazon's British site nearly every day since its publication in January, according to Rebecca Nicolson, a founder of Short Books, the independent publishing company behind the sensation. "It is selling," she said, "like hot cakes," which coincidentally are something one can actually eat on this revolutionary diet.

With an alluring cover line that reads, "Lose Weight, Stay Healthy, Live Longer," the premise of this latest weight-loss regimen — or "slimming" as the British call "dieting" — is intermittent fasting, or what has become known here as the 5:2 diet: five days of eating and drinking whatever you want, dispersed with two days of fasting.

A typical fasting day consists of two meals of roughly 250 to 300 calories each, depending on the person's sex (500 calories for women, 600 for men). Think two eggs and a slice of ham for breakfast, and a plate of steamed fish and vegetables for dinner.

It is not much sustenance, but the secret to weight loss, according to the book, is that even after just a few hours of fasting, the body begins to turn off the fat-storing mechanisms and turn on the fat-burning systems.

"I've always been into self-experimentation," said Dr. Michael Mosley, one of the book's two authors and a well-known medical journalist on the BBC who is often called the Sanjay Gupta of Britain.

He researched the science of the diet and its health benefits by putting himself through intermittent fasting and filming it for a BBC documentary last August called "Eat, Fast and Live Longer." (The broadcast gained high ratings, three million viewers, despite running during the London Olympics. PBS plans to air it in April.)

"This started because I was not feeling well last year," Dr. Mosley said recently over a cup of tea and half a cookie (it was not one of his fasting days). "It turns out I was suffering from high blood sugar, high cholesterol and had a kind of visceral fat inside my gut."

Though hardly obese at the time, at 5 feet 11 inches and 187 pounds, Dr. Mosley, 55, had a body mass index and body fat percentage that were a few points higher than the recommended amount for men. "Given that my father had died at age 73 of complications from diabetes, and I was now looking prediabetic, I knew something had to change," he added.

The result was a documentary, almost the opposite of "Super Size Me," in which Dr. Mosley not only fasted, but also interviewed scientific researchers, mostly in the United States, about the positive results of various forms of intermittent fasting, tested primarily on rats but in some cases human volunteers. The prominent benefits, he discovered, were weight loss, a lower risk of cancer and heart disease, and increased energy.

"The body goes into a repair-and-recover mode when it no longer has the work of storing the food being consumed," he said.

Though Dr. Mosley quickly gave up on the most extreme forms of fasting (he ate little more than one cup of low-calorie soup every 24 hours for four consecutive days in his first trial), he finally settled on the 5:2 ratio as a more sustainable, less painful option that could realistically be followed without annihilating his social life or work.

"Our earliest antecedents," Dr. Mosley argued, "lived a feast-or-famine existence, gorging themselves after a big hunt and then not eating until they scored the next one." Similarly, he explained, temporary fasting is a ritual of religions like Islam and Judaism — as demonstrated by Ramadan and Yom Kippur. "We shouldn't have a fear of hunger if it is just temporary," he said.

What Dr. Mosley found most astounding, however, were his personal results. Not only did he lose 20 pounds (he currently weighs 168 pounds) in nine weeks, but his glucose and cholesterol levels went down, as did his body fat. "What's more, I have a whole new level of energy," he said.

The documentary became an instant hit, which in turn led Mimi Spencer, a food and fashion writer, to propose that they collaborate on a book. "I could see this was not a faddish diet but one that was sustainable with long-term health results, beyond the obvious weight-loss benefit," said Ms. Spencer, 45, who has lost 20 pounds on the diet within four months and lowered her B.M.I. by 2 points.

The result is a 200-page paperback: the first half written by Dr. Mosley outlining the scientific findings of intermittent fasting; the second by Ms. Spencer, with encouraging text on how to get through the first days of fasting, from keeping busy so you don't hear your rumbling belly, to waiting 15 minutes for your meal or snack.

She also provides fasting recipes with tantalizing photos like feta niçoise salad and Mexican pizza, and a calorie counter at the back. (Who knew a quarter of a cup of balsamic vinegar added up to a whopping 209 calories?)

In London, the diet has taken off with the help of well-known British celebrity chefs and food writers like Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, who raved about it in The Guardian after his sixth day of fasting, having already lost eight pounds. ("I feel lean and sharper," he wrote, "and find the whole thing rather exhilarating.")

The diet is also particularly popular among men, according to Dr. Mosley, who has heard from many of his converts via e-mail and Twitter, where he has around 24,000 followers. "They find it easy to work into their schedules because dieting for a day here and there doesn't feel torturous," he said, adding that couples also particularly like doing it together.

But not everyone is singing the diet's praises. The National Health System, Britain's publicly funded medical establishment, put out a statement on its Web site shortly after the book came out: "Despite its increasing popularity, there is a great deal of uncertainty about I.F. (intermittent fasting) with significant gaps in the evidence."

The health agency also listed some side effects, including bad breath, anxiety, dehydration and irritability. Yet people in London do not seem too concerned. A slew of fasting diet books have come out in recent weeks, notably the "The 5:2 Diet Book" and "The Feast and Fast Diet."

There is also a crop of new cookbooks featuring fasting-friendly recipes. Let's just say, the British are hungry for them.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: March 2, 2013

A previous version of this article referred incorrectly to the national health care body in Britain. It is the National Health Service, not the National Health System.

A version of this article appeared in print on March 3, 2013, on page ST12 of the New York edition with the headline: England Develops a Voracious Appetite for a New Diet.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

News Kerry Hoping to Nudge Egypt Toward Reforms

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Kerry Hoping to Nudge Egypt Toward Reforms
Mar 2nd 2013, 17:08

CAIRO — John Kerry made his first trip to an Arab capital as secretary of state on Saturday, hoping to prod Egyptian politicians to commit themselves to a series of economic reforms.

Secretary of State John Kerry on Saturday with Nabil Elaraby, Arab League secretary general.

A main goal of Mr. Kerry's trip is to encourage a measure of political peace and a commitment to economic change needed to secure a crucial $4.8 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund. The United States and the European Union are prepared to provide hundreds of millions of dollars in additional assistance if Egypt can reach agreement with the I.M.F.

"His basic message is it's very important to the new Egypt for there to be a firm economic foundation," said a senior State Department official who traveled with Mr. Kerry on the flight to Cairo.

Egypt's economy has teetered near collapse for months, with soaring unemployment, a gaping budget deficit, dwindling hard-currency reserves and steep declines in the value of its currency.

The two years of tumult that began with the ouster of former President Hosni Mubarak also sharply slowed foreign investment and tourism, and economists say the Egyptian government urgently needs a cash infusion of several billion dollars to fend off the risk of an economic calamity that could lead to more unrest and instability.

 The International Monetary Fund has held on-again, off-again negotiations with Egypt for more than a year about providing the $4.8 billion. The fund's loan is critical, economists say, because it would provide a seal of approval that Egypt's economy is on a path toward self-sufficiency, allowing Cairo to obtain enough other international loans to fill in its deficit.

Economists familiar with the loan talks say that the fund's American and European backers are eager to complete the loan to move Egypt toward stability, but that the fund has imposed two difficult conditions.

It has required the Egyptian government to commit itself to undertaking painful reforms like raising taxes and reducing energy subsidies. It has also required a demonstration of political support for the reforms and the loan, to ensure that the government will honor its commitments in the future. That requires a dependable political process, as well a degree of consensus that Egypt's political factions have been unable to sustain.

There needs to be "a basic political agreement among all of the various players in Egypt," the senior State Department official said.

Toward that end, Mr. Kerry plans to conduct an intensive series of meetings with members of the political opposition, the business community and ranking government officials.

Parliamentary elections are scheduled for April in Egypt. The major opposition group, the National Salvation Front, has announced that it plans to boycott the vote to protest what it says is a push by President Mohamed Morsi and his Islamist allies to dominate politics.

The senior American official said that Mr. Kerry would not insist that the opposition participate in the election, but that he planned to make the argument that Mr. Morsi's rivals need to participate in the political process if they want their views to be taken into account.

Mr. Kerry met with Amr Moussa, a former foreign minister under Mr. Mubarak and one of the leaders of the National Salvation Front, and spoke by phone with another leader of the group, Mohamed ElBaradei.

On Sunday, Mr. Kerry is scheduled to meet with Mr. Morsi.

The protests and street violence that have destabilized Egypt's transition continued Saturday even as Mr. Kerry arrived for his visit. The Egyptian state media reported that a demonstrator in the Nile Delta city of Mansoura was killed when he was run over by an armored police vehicle.

Clashes between the police and protestors had broken out in the city several days ago and picked up Saturday after the killing. Dozens were injured, the state media said.

Violence also flared up again in the Suez Canal city of Port Said, where the state media reported that protestors had burned down a police station. The Port Said protests began on Jan. 26 after 21 local soccer fans were sentenced to death for their role in a deadly riot at a match last year. Two police and more than forty protestors were killed in the ensuing riots.

Residents have demanded a new trial for the soccer fans and retribution for those killed by the police.

Over the past month, however, the demonstrations in Port Said have blurred together with sometimes-violent protests in several other cities along the Suez Canal or in the Nile Delta. Some protestors are angry at Mr. Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, accusing them of failing to deliver fast enough on the anticipated rewards of the revolution, including economic benefits.

Michael R. Gordon reported from Cairo, and David D. Kirkpatrick from Istanbul.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

News Experts Want More Studies of Diet’s Role for the Heart

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Experts Want More Studies of Diet's Role for the Heart
Mar 2nd 2013, 16:43

Jessica Kourkounis for The New York Times

Kevin McNamara, 44, switched to a vegan diet after bypass surgery last year to open two blocked arteries, but they have never been rigorously tested for their impact.

This is a watershed moment in the field of nutrition, medical experts say. For the first time, researchers have shown that a diet can have an effect as powerful as drugs in preventing what really matters to patients — heart attacks, and strokes and deaths from cardiovascular disease.

Interactive Feature

Mr. McNamara also works out with a personal trainer.

The subjects were people at high risk of heart disease, and the diet was a Mediterranean one, high in olive oil or nuts.

The study, published last week in The New England Journal of Medicine, is now shaking up the field of cardiovascular medicine, infusing it with optimism. Scientists are calling for similarly rigorous studies of other popular diets that are routinely recommended by cardiologists even though there is little solid evidence that they work.

"We don't know what the best diet is," said Dr. Michael Lauer, the director of the division of cardiovascular sciences at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. "This is a great opportunity to come together and use power of the scientific method to get closer to the right answer."

Other leading experts agreed.

"This is the start of where we need to go with nutritional clinical trials," said Dr. Neil J. Stone, a professor of preventive cardiology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine and a former chairman of the American Heart Association's nutrition committee.

The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute is supporting a large clinical trial to see if fish oil and vitamin D can prevent heart attacks and cardiovascular deaths. But while that is important, heart experts say it is time to also look at diets as a whole.

"We definitively need to test plausible diets, within the context of what is available and consumed in the U.S., that could lower the risk of heart disease," said Alice H. Lichtenstein, a professor of nutrition science and policy at Tufts University and the lead author of the American Heart Association's dietary guidelines.

Dr. Lawrence Appel, a professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins who was a member of the 2005 and 2010 United States dietary guidelines committees, said he was inspired by the Mediterranean diet study.

"Can we do a trial of fruits and vegetables?" he asked. "I think we can."

The situation in nutrition today reminds Dr. Lauer of a previous era in the 1950s when doctors were struggling to figure out how best to treat heart attack patients.

"Nutrition research is where heart attack research was," Dr. Lauer said. Patients in those days were advised to stay in bed for four to five weeks and take lidocaine to normalize their hearts' rhythms and nitroglycerin to open blood vessels.

But it turned out that treatment actually hastened death. It took years to find the answers, but eventually, Dr. Lauer said, dozens if not hundreds of large clinical trials radically transformed heart attack treatment.

But when it comes to diet and heart disease, doctors — and patients — have been going on hunches.

The new study could be a start in changing all that, heart researchers said.

It involved 7,447 people in Spain, half of whom were randomly assigned to follow a Mediterranean diet and the rest to follow the sort of standard low-fat diet that cardiologists often prescribe. It was ended early after less than five years because those on the Mediterranean diet had 30 percent fewer heart attacks, strokes and deaths from heart disease compared with people in the control group, who ate more or less the same way that they always had. They had been instructed to follow a low-fat diet but had not been able to comply.

Dr. Ramón Estruch of the University of Barcelona, the lead author of the study, said that although some had thought people would never allow their diets to be decided by a figurative toss of a coin, it was not hard to get people to switch to a Mediterranean diet.

"They wanted to eat the way their grandfathers ate," he said. Most study participants actually thought they were already eating that way. They learned they were not after answering questions about, for example, how often they ate red meat versus fish.

Dr. Estruch said he and his colleagues were so buoyed by the success of their study that they were planning another one. They intend to randomly assign people to consume the Mediterranean diet or to exercise while following a similar diet that is lower in calories. The hope is that adding weight loss and exercise will prevent even more heart disease.

But for now, chaos reigns. The public is bombarded with diet advice, often contradictory and often lacking a rigorous scientific grounding, medical experts said.

"Diets are an extreme case of accepting evidence we want to believe," said Dr. J. Sanford Schwartz, a professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

That includes doctors, he added, who overlook that the evidence for the low-fat diets they often recommend is the sort "we would never accept in the practice of medicine."

Those low-fat diets sound sensible — eat fruits and vegetables, fish and lean meats. Cut back on salt- and sugar-laden sodas and potato chips. Cut or sharply limit most fats, including olive oil and nuts. But such diets have not been tested in the way the Mediterranean diet was tested.

Doctors are in a bind, said Dr. Daniel J. Rader, a heart disease specialist at the University of Pennsylvania. When patients ask what to eat, he said, "you have to give them something."

"Given the importance of diets and given the decades of dietary recommendations we have given to people, you would think we would have had more dietary studies with hard endpoints to get at these questions," Dr. Rader said. But the best they have are studies that look at intermediate markers of risk, like cholesterol levels. In the end, he said, "most doctors just give dietary platitudes."

Kevin McNamara, 44, faced a decision about diet after he went into cardiac arrest in June while jogging along the Jersey Shore. Mr. McNamara, an investment manager, had no idea he had heart disease. He ended up in the nearest hospital and had bypass surgery to open two blocked arteries. When he returned to his home near Valley Forge, Pa., he sought advice on what to eat and was persuaded by a book that said a vegan diet would prevent and even reverse heart disease.

"I talked to some of my doctors, and they said it wouldn't hurt if I went on a vegan diet," Mr. McNamara said.

Now he wants to discuss the Mediterranean diet with his doctors. He worries because he wants to keep his cholesterol levels very low. "I am paranoid that any sort of fat will build up in my coronary arteries," Mr. McNamara said. But he added, "I am not sure if I want to do a vegan diet for the next 30 or 40 years of my life."

Vegan diets have never been rigorously tested, and probably never will be, Dr. Lichtenstein said. "Given the high cost of conducting a long-term diet study we have to think about what is feasible for the majority of the U.S. population," she said. "From past experience, we know it is highly unlikely people are going to make radical changes in their diet and stick with those changes long term."

But other diet studies are definitely in the offing, researchers said.

"As we go on, we realize we know less and less," Dr. Lauer said. "We can despair and just make things up, or we can celebrate and say we have a real opportunity to grow here."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

News Two Afghan Boys Accidentally Killed by NATO Helicopter

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Two Afghan Boys Accidentally Killed by NATO Helicopter
Mar 2nd 2013, 17:00

KABUL, Afghanistan — Two boys out collecting firewood with their donkeys were killed by weapons fired from a NATO helicopter, Afghan and American military officials announced on Saturday.

The new American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., promptly issued an apology and said the killings were an accident.

The victims, Toor Jan, 11, and Andul Wodood, 12, were brothers and had been walking behind their donkeys in the Shahed-e-Hasas district of Oruzgan Province when the helicopter fired on them, according to Afghan officials in the district. The two donkeys were killed as well.

General Dunford said that coalition forces had opened fire on what they thought were insurgent forces, and killed the boys by accident. "I offer my personal apology and condolences to the family of the boys who were killed," General Dunford said. "We take full responsibility for this tragedy."

There was some disagreement about the presence of Taliban in the area and about the details of the episode.

Haji Mohammad Esmail, head of the district shura or council, said the area was "fully under government control," and that "we haven't seen any engagement in the area and nor is the area threatened by the Taliban."

Abdullah Himat, a spokesman for the provincial government in Oruzgan, in southern Afghanistan, said that while the shooting was a mistake, there had been Taliban presence in the area and insurgents had opened fire on the helicopter. Both Australian and American soldiers were involved in the episode, he said.

Fareed Ayal, the spokesman for the provincial police chief, said the helicopter was hunting for Taliban by tracking their radio signals when the killings took place. "There wasn't any engagement with the Taliban, it was just a mistake that they have killed the two boys at an area where they thought they detected a Taliban radio signal," he said.

The episode was the second airstrike to kill civilians since General Dunford assumed command in February. In Kunar Province in eastern Afghanistan, up to 11 civilians were killed, including 5 children, when airstrikes were used to destroy two homes.

That attack, which included Afghan forces on the ground, led President Hamid Karzai to forbid Afghan units from asking for airstrikes by coalition air forces. The Afghans have little air capability of their own. General Dunford met with Mr. Karzai after the episode in Kunar and expressed his "personal condolences" for the civilian deaths.

The coalition last year imposed strict rules limiting the use of airstrikes in areas where civilians are present.

Taimoor Shah contributed reporting from Kandahar, Afghanistan.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

News Florida Sinkhole Growing as Engineers Investigate

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Florida Sinkhole Growing as Engineers Investigate
Mar 2nd 2013, 17:16

Chris O'Meara/Associated Press

An engineer wore a safety line Saturday outside the house in Seffner, Fla., where a bedroom and its occupant fell into a sinkhole.

SEFFNER, Fla. (AP) — Engineers worked gingerly on Saturday to find out more about a slowly growing sinkhole that had swallowed a Florida man in his bedroom, believing the entire house could succumb to the unstable ground.

Police tape kept onlookers safely across the street on Friday.

Jeff Bush

Jeff Bush, 37, was in his bedroom on Thursday night when the earth opened and took him and everything else in his room. Five other people were in the house but escaped unharmed. Mr. Bush's brother jumped into the hole to try to help, but he had to be rescued by a sheriff's deputy.

Engineers returned to the property on Saturday morning to do more tests after taking soil samples and running tests there all day Friday. They said the entire lot was dangerous, and no one was allowed in the house.

"I cannot tell you why it has not collapsed yet," said Bill Bracken, the owner of an engineering company called to assess the sinkhole. He described the earth below as a "very large, very fluid mass."

"This is not your typical sinkhole," said Michael Merrill, the Hillsborough County administrator. "This is a chasm. For that reason, we're being very deliberate."

The hole had grown to 20 feet deep and 30 feet wide by Friday night, and officials said it was still expanding and "seriously unstable."

Officials delicately addressed another sad reality: Mr. Bush was likely dead, and the family wanted his body.

"They would like us to go in quickly and locate Mr. Bush," Mr. Merrill said.

Two neighboring houses were evacuated, and officials were considering further evacuations. Members of the media were moved from a lawn across the street to a safer area a few hundred feet away.

"This is a very complex situation," said the Hillsborough County fire chief, Ron Rogers. "It's continuing to evolve, and the ground is continuing to collapse."

Sinkholes are so common in Florida that the state requires home insurers to provide coverage against the danger. While some cars, homes and other buildings have been devoured, it is extremely rare for a sinkhole to swallow a person.

Florida is highly prone to sinkholes because of the underground prevalence of limestone, a porous rock that easily dissolves in water, creating caverns.

"You can almost envision a piece of Swiss cheese," Taylor Yarkosky, a sinkhole expert from Brooksville, Fla., said while gesturing to the ground and the sky-blue house where the earth opened in Seffner. "Any house in Florida could be in that same situation."

A sinkhole near Orlando grew to 400 feet across in 1981 and devoured five cars, most of two businesses, a three-bedroom house and the deep end of an Olympic-size swimming pool.

More than 500 sinkholes have been reported in Hillsborough County alone since the government started keeping track in 1954, according to the state's environmental agency.

The sinkhole that swallowed Mr. Bush caused the home's concrete floor to cave in around 11 p.m. Thursday as everyone in the Tampa-area house was turning in for the night. It gave way with a loud crash that sounded like a car hitting the house and brought Mr. Bush's brother, Jeremy, running.

Jeremy Bush said he had jumped into the hole but could not see his brother before the ground crumbled around him. A sheriff's deputy reached out and pulled him to safety.

"The floor was still giving in and the dirt was still going down, but I didn't care — I wanted to save my brother," Jeremy Bush said through tears Friday in a neighbor's yard. "But I just couldn't do nothing."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

News Budget Cuts’ Impact May Be Difficult to See Right Away

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Budget Cuts' Impact May Be Difficult to See Right Away
Mar 2nd 2013, 14:52

WASHINGTON — Seventeen months after President Obama signed doomsday budget legislation that was never intended to become law, the sweeping spending reductions in the measure have been imposed.

Graphic

Late Friday night, Mr. Obama formally triggered spending cuts that will reach across the breadth of the federal government after he failed to persuade Congressional Republicans to replace them with a mix of cuts and tax increases.

In a 70-page report to Congress accompanying the order and detailing the reductions — agency by agency and program by program — Jeffrey D. Zients, Mr. Obama's budget director, called them "deeply destructive to national security, domestic investments and core government functions."

But even as the cuts become official, some of the immediate impact is difficult to see.

The process of trimming government budgets is slow and cumbersome, involving lengthy notifications to unions about temporary furloughs, reductions in overtime pay and cuts in grant financing to state and local programs. Less federal money will, over time, mean fewer government contracts with private companies. Reduced overtime for airport security checkpoint officers will make lines longer, eventually.

And so as the first weekend began for the new, slimmer government, little of that is evident yet.

Letters to governors, informing them of the smaller grants are beginning to go out, officials said. Shaun Donovan, the secretary of housing and urban development, wrote to Gov. John R. Kasich of Ohio: "You can expect reductions totaling approximately $35 million," helpfully putting the amount in a bold type.

The Air Force Thunderbirds — the elite team of F-16 pilots who perform tricks at air shows — announced on its Web site that all of its shows have been canceled starting April 1. The last show will be in Titusville, Fla., on March 23.

Still, it will take some time, officials acknowledged, before the cuts begin to make life more difficult for teachers, defense contractors, Head Start students, border patrol agents or others who rely on the largess of the federal government.

Emerging from an Oval Office meeting on Friday with the lawmakers, the president called the cuts "just dumb." He said they would slow the economic recovery and spoke emotionally about their impact on people who would feel the consequences of government layoffs and disruptions in public services.

"I don't anticipate a huge financial crisis, but people are going to be hurt," Mr. Obama said during a 35-minute news conference at the White House, in which he acknowledged that his campaign of highlighting fallout from the cuts had failed to persuade Republicans to consider tax increases as part of a package to avert the $85 billion in reductions over the next seven months.

But the president and his Republican adversaries said they would not carry the fight over the cuts into a coming legislative effort to finance the government through Sept. 30, essentially declaring a cease-fire in the budget wars that have dominated Washington since 2011.

The showdown in December over the so-called fiscal cliff yielded $620 billion in tax increases over 10 years. The across-the-board spending cuts now going into force will cut deficits an additional $1.2 trillion.

Both sides indicated that for now, that may be enough — a fiscal peace through political exhaustion. The two parties are now expected to move to a broader argument over the right level of taxes and spending as they seek to develop a new budget for the coming year and beyond. Republicans said they welcomed a return to a more orderly budget process but warned they would not give in on their basic principles.

"I will not be part of any back-room deal, and I will absolutely not agree to increase taxes," said Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader.

After a public relations blitz lasting weeks that was aimed at stopping the cuts, Mr. Obama said he was prepared to extend a stopgap law that finances the government to March 27 if Republicans stuck to an agreement worked out in 2011 about the level of federal spending. The decision will most likely allow the across-the-board spending reductions to remain in place for months if not years.

White House officials and Senate Democrats had considered making one last stand around the March 27 deadline, declaring the Senate would not pass another government spending plan unless it undid the across-the-board cuts. But Senate Democrats were leery. The first furloughs are likely to hit in April, and the Democrats feared that little political pressure would have built on Republicans before the current stopgap spending law expired.

On Friday, Mr. Obama used janitors and security guards as examples of federal employees whose pay will be cut because of the reductions. "They've got to figure out how to manage that," he said.

In fact, as pointed out by The Washington Post's Fact Checker, Capitol officials e-mailed the building's staff to say that the president's comment was not true. The Capitol's sergeant-at-arms, who is in charge of the building's officers, said that, "None of my employees will have their pay cut nor will they face furloughs."

In his weekly address on Saturday morning, the president acknowledged that the reductions would not affect everyone equally.

"While not everyone will feel the pain of these cuts right away, the pain will be real," Mr. Obama said. "Many middle-class families will have their lives disrupted in a significant way."

And heading into the weekend, some officials seemed eager to offer reassurance that government would continue to function despite the deep cuts.

While Leon E. Panetta, who just left the job of defense secretary, had thundered about the critical risk to national security — and lamented what he viewed as a shift of Washington's political class away from good governance — his successor, Chuck Hagel, spoke in more conciliatory terms.

To be sure, Mr. Hagel listed the specific risks to national security that could arrive with the cuts, also called the sequester. But even as he noted that the United States "has the best fighting force, the most capable fighting force, the most powerful fighting force in the world," he pledged that he and the Joint Chiefs of Staff "will manage these issues."

"These are adjustments," Mr. Hagel said of the cuts to be imposed by the cuts. "We anticipated these kinds of realities, and we will do what we need to do to assure the capabilities of our forces."

Mr. Obama has signaled that he remains eager to replace across-the-board cuts with deficit reduction that consists of more targeted reductions and increased revenue from closing tax loopholes. An e-mail sent late Friday to supporters from his former campaign operation had the subject line "Devastating."

"Congress can stop all of this right away — and pursue a balanced approach to deficit reduction," wrote Jon Carson, the president of Organizing for Action, the political operation created to advance the president's agenda. "That's what the vast majority of Americans want."

But Mr. Obama, too, said in his address on Saturday that it was time to move on to other topics.

"I'm going to push through this paralysis and keep fighting for the real challenges facing middle-class families," he said, citing efforts to increase the minimum wage, provide money for more preschool for children and pass an immigration overhaul.

In the Republican radio response, Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington State, the chairwoman of the Republican conference, also called the cuts "devastating" to America, but said that Republicans in the House would not yield on the issue of taxes.

"Spending is the problem, which means cutting spending is the solution," she said. "It's that simple."

In fact, nothing about the sequestration law is simple. And the 70-page report on its implementation proves that point. The report calculates how much each program will lose, "as required by sections 251A(7)(A) and 253(f)(2) of BBEDCA." Those numbers are detailed in page after page of complex tables.

In his letter, Mr. Zients called the law establishing the cuts "a blunt and indiscriminate instrument. It was never intended to be implemented and does not represent a responsible way for our nation to achieve deficit reduction."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions