NYT > Home Page: U.N. Panel to Investigate Rise in Drone Strikes

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
U.N. Panel to Investigate Rise in Drone Strikes
Jan 25th 2013, 03:18

Ijaz Muhammad/Associated Press

In March 2009, Pakistanis visited a house in Chota Janikhel that was believed to have been hit by an American missile strike.

LONDON — A prominent British human rights lawyer said on Thursday that a United Nations panel he leads would investigate what he called the "exponential rise" in drone strikes used in counterterrorist operations, "with a view to determining whether there is a plausible allegation of unlawful killing."

The lawyer, Ben Emmerson, special investigator for the United Nations Human Rights Council, said at a news conference that the nine-month study would look at "drone strikes and other forms of remotely targeted killing," including a wide array of so-called standoff weapons used in modern warfare, like ground-launched missiles and similar weapons fired from manned aircraft.

The immediate focus, Mr. Emmerson said in an interview, would be on 25 selected drone strikes that had been conducted in recent years in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and the Palestinian territories. That put the panel's spotlight on the United States, Britain and Israel, the nations that have conducted drone attacks in those areas, but Mr. Emmerson said the inquiry would not be singling out the United States or any other countries.

"Absolutely not," he said in the interview. "The United States may be the market leader in the use of drone technology, but there are more than 50 states with the technology that can be easily converted into an active drone arsenal."

He added, "This form of warfare is here to stay, and it is completely unacceptable to allow the world to drift blindly toward the precipice without any agreement between states as to the circumstances in which drone strike targeted killings are lawful, and on the safeguards necessary to protect civilians."

At his news conference, Mr. Emmerson, a co-founder of the London law partnership that includes Cherie Blair, wife of the former British prime minister Tony Blair, said the panel would assess the selected drone strikes and the reports that some of them had caused "disproportionate civilian casualties," while posing little or no risk to the drone operators and offering a relatively inexpensive strike option to the nations using the drones.

The ensuing report, he said, would make recommendations to the General Assembly in New York in October on "the duty of states to conduct thorough independent and impartial investigations" into cases involving civilian casualties "with a view to securing accountability and reparation where things have gone badly wrong."

Any bid to place drone strikes under closer international scrutiny seems likely to run into strong resistance from the Obama administration, which has made widespread use of the weapons, particularly in the border areas of Pakistan. White House officials have said that Mr. Obama himself has personally approved many of the strikes, which are mainly carried out by drones operated by the Central Intelligence Agency.

At his news conference, Mr. Emmerson noted that John O. Brennan, deputy national security adviser in the White House, defended the strikes as part of the United States' right to defend its national security against a stateless enemy. But he said that argument had been rejected by most countries "and by the majority of international lawyers outside the United States."

The inquiry grew out of a statement condemning the strikes that was issued at the human rights council in Geneva last year by a group of nations that have been severely critical of the American use of drones, led by China, Russia and Pakistan. Subsequently, Mr. Emmerson angered American officials by suggesting that some "double tap" drone attacks, involving a second missile attack on a target, could be described as war crimes because they had been reported in some instances as having killed mourners at funerals for people killed in the initial strike, or tribal elders meeting at the target sites.

Mr. Emmerson said that the 10-member panel included two Americans. One, Sarah Knuckey, is a human rights lawyer who teaches at New York University and wrote a report last year on civilian casualties from the American drone strikes in Pakistan that cited "the disastrous impact the drone strikes are having on the people who live under them." The other, Capt. Jason Wright, is a serving Army lawyer who was at one time a defense counsel at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the professed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Other panel members include two prominent British lawyers, a British forensic pathologist, a senior Pakistani judge and a Yemeni human rights activist.

In the interview, Mr. Emmerson said that he had received "reliable indications of cooperation from a variety of states" and that he was "strongly optimistic" that the Obama administration would follow their lead despite its reluctance in the past to disclose details of its inquiries into drone strikes to independent investigators and human rights groups.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 25, 2013, on page A4 of the New York edition with the headline: U.N. Panel To Assess Drone Use.

Media files:
jp-london-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Richard G. Stern, a Writers’ Writer, Is Dead at 84

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Richard G. Stern, a Writers' Writer, Is Dead at 84
Jan 25th 2013, 03:25

Steve Kagan

The writer Richard G. Stern, at his home in 2001, taught literature and creative writing at the University of Chicago.

Richard G. Stern, whose novels, short stories and essays were almost universally admired in the literary world but whose name remained stubbornly unrecognized in the wider world of readers, earning him a reputation for being, as one reviewer put it, "the best American author of whom you have never heard," died on Thursday at his home on Tybee Island, Ga. He was 84.

The cause was cancer, said his wife, Alane Rollings.

Mr. Stern wrote more than 20 books of fiction and nonfiction, mostly while teaching literature and creative writing at the University of Chicago. There he was at the center of a writerly cohort that included Philip Roth and Saul Bellow, and his classroom became a showcase for visiting literary eminences.

"He was an inspiring figure as a literature professor and an ace of great virtuosity as a novelist, short story writer, essayist and raconteur," Mr. Roth said in a telephone interview on Thursday. He added: "I was faculty, but I used to go to his class and sit at the back. It was there I met Bellow. It was there I met Lowell and Berryman and Mailer."

Mr. Roth recalled an afternoon in the mid-1950s when he and Mr. Stern were having lunch.

"I began telling him the story of how I spent my previous summer in New Jersey," Mr. Roth said. "And he said, 'Write it down.' I said, 'What?' He said, 'Write it down.' And that was 'Goodbye, Columbus' " — the title novella of Mr. Roth's first book.

Perhaps Mr. Stern's best known novel is "Other Men's Daughters" (1973), a drama, drawn from his own life, about a love affair between a middle-aged married man and a younger woman. Recognizing the theme as well worn, the critic Jonathan Yardley nonetheless wrote in The Washington Post Book World, "I cannot recall its being treated elsewhere in recent fiction with more fidelity to and understanding of the truths of separation, divorce and readjustment."

Generally, Mr. Stern's subject was the inner life of educated people and his strength examining intra-family relations. His prose was dense but not difficult, erudite but not pretentious; as an observer of human behavior he was both ruthless and generous, acknowledging characters' finer attributes but homing in on their foibles. He could be seen as a comic novelist, if a dark one.

"One of the reasons he never became famous — he was most famous among famous writers — was that his tone was hard to grasp, and some readers didn't feel morally settled," Mr. Roth said, "not because he was difficult or abstruse but because he was generous to all his characters. And that befuddled them."

In the 1986 novel "A Father's Words," for example, the narrator, Cy Riemer, the editor of a science newsletter and the divorced father of three, observes his daughter Livy in a passage that reveals both characters:

"Self-knowledge is her line. It's her problem as well. She doesn't understand her own gifts, her charm, her decency. As for me, she overrates my knowledge and underrates my selfishness. What others consider a virtue, she dismisses. 'Why are you so anxious to know about things?' she asks. 'You're going to run across the street to gawk at some historical marker and be hit by a truck. What's the difference where a treaty was signed? Or where some poet laid his cousin? You know more about Darwin and Rilke than you do about yourself.' Riemers are athletes of the mouth. Gab is our sport. We'll say anything to make a rhetorical point. (Witness this triple version of saying we talk a lot.)"

Mr. Stern's admirers have included Anthony Burgess, Flannery O'Connor, Thomas Berger and Richard Ellmann.

In 1985, Mr. Stern received the Medal of Merit for the Novel, awarded every six years by the Academy of Arts and Letters. Its winners have included Theodore Dreiser, Ernest Hemingway and Vladimir Nabokov.

"I never understood his obscurity," Mr. Roth said. "Every writer in America read and admired him."

Richard Gustave Stern was born in New York City on Feb. 25, 1928. His father, Henry, was a dentist, and though not bookish he was an avid storyteller, whom Mr. Stern credited with fostering his own desire to tell tales.

He began writing stories at age 12. After graduating from Stuyvesant High School in Manhattan, he attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, graduating in 1947. He got his master's degree at Harvard and Ph.D. from the University of Iowa. While at Iowa he published his first short story, in The Kenyon Review. Another early story, "The Sorrows of Captain Schreiber," won an O. Henry award as one of the best short stories of 1954.

After a year teaching at Connecticut College in New London, he landed at the University of Chicago in 1955 and remained there, as something of a legend, until his retirement in 2001.

"It's important at the University of Chicago, where the Great Works loom monumentally, to free students from the paralysis of intimidation by them," he wrote. "I don't hesitate to compare the best student work with the work of masters. This is not meant to cheapen the marvelous but to evoke it. The hope is to make students fall in love with sublimity and to show them it's not out of reach."

Mr. Stern's first book, the satirical "Golk" (1960), which centered on a TV show much like "Candid Camera," was one of the first serious novels to take aim at the oversized influence of television; his second, "Europe: Or Up and Down With Schreiber and Baggish" (1961), was a comic tale of two Americans, a down-and-out lawyer and a manipulative clerk, traveling in Europe.

Both were well-received as works by a writer with promise, though perhaps more memorable was his brief, caustic review in 1961 of "Catch-22" in The New York Times Book Review.

"Its author, Joseph Heller, is like a brilliant painter who decides to throw all the ideas in his sketchbooks onto one canvas, relying on their charm and shock to compensate for the lack of design," Mr. Stern wrote. The comment has often been quoted in discussions of how the novel came to be seen as a classic of 20th-century war fiction.

Mr. Stern's other novels include "Stitch" (1965), drawn from his experience as a Fulbright scholar in Europe and his acquaintanceship with the poet Ezra Pound, on whom the main character was based; and "Natural Shocks" (1978), which concerns a worldly journalist who accepts an assignment to write about death and becomes attached to a young woman dying of cancer.

Among his other books are the short story collections "Packages," (1980), "Noble Rot" (1988) and "Almonds to Zhoof" (2004); a collection of essays, "The Books in Fred Hampton's Apartment" (1973); and "A Sistermony," a memoir about his older sister, Ruth, and her death from cancer.

Mr. Stern's first marriage, to Gay Clark, ended in divorce. Besides Ms. Rollings, a poet, he is survived by four children from the earlier marriage — Christopher, Andrew, Nicholas and Kate — and five grandchildren.

Mr. Stern was well aware that he was more well-known in a small pool of writers than in the larger one of readers.

"I was a has-been before I'd been a been," he often said.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 25, 2013, on page A19 of the New York edition with the headline: Richard G. Stern, 84, Writers' Writer, Dies.

Media files:
STERN-obit-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Mali Army, Riding U.S. Hopes, Is Proving No Match for Militants

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Mali Army, Riding U.S. Hopes, Is Proving No Match for Militants
Jan 25th 2013, 03:34

Marco Gualazzini for The New York Times

Boubacar Yattara had to flee when his unit was deserted by fellow soldiers during a battle.

DIABALY, Mali — At first, the battle went well.

Interactive Feature

Malian soldiers in Diabaly. "Without the help of the French," the mayor said, Islamists fighters "would still be here. They would have gone all the way to Bamako."

A house damaged in the bombing of Diabaly. "We thought the army would protect us," said a resident who spent nearly a week hiding from militants. "But they simply ran away."

Mali joined a counterterrorism partnership with neighbors.

Boubacar Yattara, a 25-year-old Malian soldier, fed the heavy machine gun atop an armored vehicle. His unit fired on a truck full of Islamist militants, destroying it. He radioed for reinforcements, but his commanding officer had bad news. His fellow soldiers had already fallen back, beating a hasty retreat.

So Mr. Yattara did what other soldiers had done as the fighting intensified: He stripped off his uniform, waded through an irrigation canal and melted into the town's civilian population.

"They abandoned us," Mr. Yattara said of the other soldiers, speaking from the hospital bed where he was being treated for a concussion. "We barely escaped with our lives."

In many ways, the battle for Diabaly was over before it even began, the latest in a long string of humiliating defeats for an army that the United States once hoped would be a model for fighting Islamic extremism in one of the most forbidding regions of the world. Instead, it is a weak, dysfunctional force that is as much a cause of Mali's crisis as a potential part of the solution.

Beyond fleeing in the heat of battle, hundreds of Malian soldiers, including commanders of elite units trained by the United States, defected to the rebels who swept across the desert last year, according to senior Malian military officials. Then an American-trained captain toppled the democratically elected government in a coup, creating a chaos that allowed half the country to fall into the hands of Islamist militants.

Now that same Malian Army, which the United Nations expected to be rebuilt over many months of training, has been thrust into the fight once again after a sudden militant surge this month — though it is no better prepared than it was before. Indeed, diplomats in the capital, Bamako, and at the United Nations say that if French warplanes and troops had not joined the effort, the Islamist fighters would have overrun the entire country.

"We thought the army would protect us," said Gaoussou Keita, a 57-year-old radio repairman in Diabaly, who spent nearly a week hiding from militants who occupied his hometown this month. "But they simply ran away."

Worse than that, human rights groups say, Malian soldiers have been accused of atrocities in recent weeks, including summary executions of at least 11 people suspected of being insurgents.

"These acts of reprisal combined with the extreme tension between communities constitute an explosive cocktail that makes one fear the worst," said Souhayr Belhassen, the president of the International Federation for Human Rights, in a statement.

The army has abused its own soldiers as well, a reflection of the bitter divisions that have often kept the army more focused on its critics and internal rivals than on the militants controlling the nation's north. According to Human Rights Watch, defiant soldiers have been beaten and forced at gunpoint to perform anal sex on one another.

Instilling a respect for human rights and international law was supposed to be a cornerstone of the training for Malian forces, according to the United Nations Security Council resolution that passed in December. Suddenly, the unexpected Islamist advance and the French intervention inverted those tortuously negotiated plans — forcing some Malian units to fight right away while others wait for training later.

But the army's frequent defeats and spotty human rights record have rekindled longstanding doubts about whether it can — or perhaps even should — be left to hold on to the gains French troops have made.

"Given that the Malian Army is internally divided, lacks the capacity to effectively project force, has been implicated in human rights abuses, and is very small," said a report by the Congressional Research Service this month, "it is uncertain whether Malian forces will be able to effectively follow up on French military strikes by securing and holding territory."

So far 1,600 troops from Nigeria, Togo, Niger and Benin have arrived in Mali to form part of an African-led force to drive back the militants and ultimately recapture the northern half of the country. But many more are expected, and it will take months to begin retooling Mali's ragtag army to the point that it can play any major role in the fight to chase militants from the north, analysts say.

In the meantime, many Malians, who have watched their government and country be thrown into turmoil since the army coup last year, have grown frustrated at the military's failure to stop the militant threat.

"Without the help of the French," said Diabaly's mayor, Oumar Diakite, the Islamists fighters "would still be here. They would have gone all the way to Bamako." 

Mr. Yattara's account of the battle for Diabaly helps illustrate some of the myriad troubles plaguing Mali's army. Assigned with reloading the heavy machine gun atop an armored vehicle based in this central Malian town, Mr. Yattara had long complained to the chief of matériel that his weapon was unfit for service.

"It was wobbling on the top of the vehicle and not firing effectively," Mr. Yattara said. "But they ignored me. I fixed it as much as I could with some stones to weigh down the gun."

On the day the Islamists arrived, Mr. Yattara's vehicle was sent to a forward position, placed between two others in a string of defenders designed to protect Diabaly.

The weapon on the first vehicle failed, so the soldiers fled, Mr. Yattara said. They begged for reinforcements, but the rest of the soldiers had already retreated. Eventually he ran out of ammunition, too, and decided he had to flee as well, suffering the concussion when a bullet hit his helmet.

"Our commanders don't listen to us, they don't support us," Mr. Yattara said bitterly. "It is complete chaos."

For years, the United States worked closely with Mali's military as part of a more than $500 million counterterrorism program to train and equip armies across the Sahara to combat militants. With only about 7,000 people in its military and other security forces, and just a handful of working helicopters and airplanes, Mali had acknowledged how daunting a task it was to defend its vast desert borders and drive out growing numbers of Islamist militants, including those aligned with Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

So the Malians eagerly agreed five years ago to join a multiyear partnership between the State and Defense Departments that also included Algeria, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Tunisia. It was the most ambitious American counterterrorism effort ever in the region.

American Special Forces provided Malian infantry troops with training in marksmanship, border patrol, ambush drills and other skills. The program also offered Malian forces their first opportunity to train with more capable armies from neighbors like Senegal, a trend toward regional cooperation that budget-conscious American policy makers and military officials sought to promote.

But no one seemed to anticipate the sudden influx of heavily armed, battle-hardened fighters returning from Libya after the fall of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. They reinvigorated a longstanding rebellion in the north, spurring as many as 1,600 Malian soldiers to defect, according to one senior Malian military official.

The remaining Malian forces were routed so thoroughly that troops overthrew the government in Bamako in frustration. As a result of the coup, the American military suspended aid and training to the Malian military.

Pentagon officials acknowledged that the training and equipping of the Malian forces failed to keep pace with the growing threat from increasingly powerful Islamist extremists.

"We provided training and equipment for many years now, but in relatively modest quantities," Amanda Dory, a deputy assistant secretary of defense for Africa, told a Senate hearing last month. "I don't think that level of resourcing was commensurate with the threat."

Indeed, Malian commanders say that they simply do not have the equipment or training to face the Islamist militants in battle.

"We are a poor country," said Col. Seydou Sogoba, leader of the troops in Diabaly. "No African country can face this kind of threat alone. This is an international war that is being fought in Mali. We have done what we can. Now others need to come and help us."

Eric Schmitt contributed reporting from Washington, Neil MacFarqhuar from the United Nations, and Scott Sayare from Paris.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 25, 2013, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Mali Army, Riding U.S. Hopes, Is Proving No Match for Militants.

Media files:
Mali-moth-v2.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Republican Governors Push Taxes on Sales, Not Income

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Republican Governors Push Taxes on Sales, Not Income
Jan 25th 2013, 03:11

WASHINGTON — Republican governors are moving aggressively to cut personal and corporate income taxes, including proposals that would increase reliance on state sales taxes, setting up ambitious experiments in tax reform that could shape what is possible on a national level.

Even as Washington continues to discuss, if not act, on ideas for making the federal tax system simpler and more efficient, governors, some with an eye on the next presidential race, are taking advantage of the improving economy and a gradual rebound in revenues to act.

In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal is pushing to repeal the state's personal and corporate income taxes and make up the lost revenue through higher sales taxes. Gov. Dave Heineman of Nebraska is calling for much the same thing in his state. Gov. Sam Brownback of Kansas wants to keep in place what was supposed to be a temporary increase in the state sales tax to help pay for his plan to lower and eventually end his state's income tax.

Along the way these governors are taking small first steps into a debate over what kind of tax system most encourages growth in a 21st-century economy. In particular they are focusing attention on the idea, long championed by conservatives but accepted up to a point by economists of all stripes, that the economy would be better served by focusing taxation on consumption rather than on income.

Taxing consumption has the potential to lift economic growth by encouraging more savings and investment. But the shift could also increase inequality by reducing taxes predominantly for the wealthy, who spend a smaller share of their income than middle- and lower-income people.

"The question of whether we should tax income or whether we should tax spending is really a proxy for a different debate," said Joseph Henchman, vice president for state projects at the Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning research organization. "Everyone agrees we'll get more growth with consumption taxes. It's just that some people prioritize fairness."

Beyond citing economic growth, the governors and their supporters say their plans would help make their states more competitive in attracting employers and high-skilled workers, simplify their tax systems and curb pressure for more government spending.

For Mr. Jindal and other Republican governors who are considering a presidential run in 2016, there are obvious political benefits to having a robust income tax-cutting record to present to conservative primary voters.

But Democrats say the approach would lead to cutbacks in education, health care and other vital services while shifting relatively more of the tax burden to those who can least afford it.

"These aren't pro-growth policies — they're shell games that reward the wealthiest Americans at the expense of everyone else," said Danny Kanner, a spokesman for the Democratic Governors Association.

Nationwide, sales taxes account for about 46 percent of state revenues, and personal and corporate income taxes for about 42 percent, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. States with relatively low income tax rates like Louisiana, which raises about $3 billion a year from its personal and corporate income tax system, can more easily shift toward a sales tax-only system than states with much higher rates, like New York or California.

Louisiana already has the nation's third-highest sales tax, after Tennessee and Arizona. Combined state and local sales taxes average 8.84 percent, according to the Tax Foundation.

It is not clear whether any of the proposals will make it into law; even in states with Republican-dominated legislatures, governors face difficulty as they pursue their proposals because changing the tax code almost invariably creates losers as well as winners. In Kansas, Mr. Brownback wants to pay for lower income tax rates in part by making permanent what had originally been a temporary sales tax increase, but also by eliminating deductions for property taxes and mortgage interest, setting off objections even in his own party.

And just as President Obama has raised income tax rates on upper-income families, Democratic governors including Martin O'Malley of Maryland, Jerry Brown of California and Deval Patrick of Massachusetts have supported or put in place income tax increases on the wealthy.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 25, 2013, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Governors Push Bigger Reliance On Sales Taxes .

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Victoria Azarenka’s Timeout Jeered Round the World

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Victoria Azarenka's Timeout Jeered Round the World
Jan 25th 2013, 02:51

MELBOURNE, Australia — When the world's top-ranked female tennis player was examined on the court and then granted a medical timeout Thursday during her semifinal match at the Australian Open, the howling commenced immediately. Skeptical fans at Rod Laver Arena and those watching on television worldwide were convinced that the player, Victoria Azarenka of Belarus, was suffering from nothing more than an attack of nerves and perhaps faked an injury to collect herself after losing several crucial points.

Victoria Azarenka received medical treatment during a key moment in the Australian Open semifinals.

Azarenka, who said she had a rib injury, conceded that the timing of her timeout was poor.

After her 10-minute reprieve — six minutes of it off the court — Azarenka closed out a 6-1, 6-4 victory. A sport that in recent years has dealt with loudly grunting players and accusations of match fixing is now facing another vexation: determining what constitutes a real injury.

Azarenka's opponent, Sloane Stephens of the United States, called injury timeouts — legitimate or not — "the in thing," noting that Azarenka was one of many recent opponents to use a medical timeout. "It's trendy," Stephens said.

Others were more critical. "I thought it was a little unfair play," said David Nainkin, Stephens's coach. "I thought she bent the rules. I don't think she broke the rules, but she bent them, and I think those rules need to be looked at because I think there's a gray area there."

The TV analyst Patrick McEnroe called the timeout an "absolute travesty" in a post on his Twitter page. (McEnroe also heads the United States Tennis Association's player development program, which has supported Stephens.)

"I mean, everybody's appalled by it," said Pam Shriver, an analyst and a former player.

The controversy arose when Azarenka, serving for the match against the 29th-seeded Stephens at 5-3 in the second set, failed to convert on five match points and was eventually broken. When she took her seat during the changeover, she wrapped a towel stuffed with ice around her neck and was examined by the primary health care provider for the women's tour, Victoria Simpson, and by a tournament doctor, Tim Wood. She then left the court for further treatment, leaving Stephens, in her first Grand Slam semifinal, waiting nearly 10 minutes for the next game.

Stephens, who had upset the tournament favorite, Serena Williams, in the quarterfinals, proceeded to lose her serve and the match. She did not blame Azarenka's timeout for her loss.

Azarenka did not mention an injury during her on-court interview after the match, but she did refer to a feeling of crisis at the 5-4 changeover. "I almost did the choke of the year," she said. "I just felt a little bit overwhelmed. I realized I'm one step away from the final, and nerves got into me, for sure."

Azarenka added: "I love to play here and I just couldn't lose. That's why I was so upset."

Later, in a news conference, she said that she left the court for treatment of a rib injury and that she had not mentioned the injury in her on-court interview because she had misunderstood the question.

Shriver, who noted that Azarenka had also not mentioned the injury in an ESPN interview while coming off the court, was skeptical.

"I think her response at the time was very honest and truthful, that she was stretching the rules," Shriver said. "That was my reaction coming off the interview and so that's why I think all of us, many of us, jumped on it. Because we've seen the rule abused for years. I abused the rule when I played."

If Azarenka was not legitimately injured, was calling a medical timeout cheating? Playing at the edge of the rules? Good old win-at-any-cost strategy?

To Michael F. Bergeron, executive director of the National Youth Sports Health & Safety Institute, it is part of a disturbing trend that has taken hold in youth sports, emphasizing winning over sportsmanship and developing character.

"I'm not saying everyone does that, and I'd like to think there are still players who would never do it," Bergeron said. "It shows a lack of character, a lack of respect for her opponent and the game. You'd like to think sports would be developing those traits. But in the bigger picture, this emphasis on winning and losing over everything else is doing athletes a disservice. It's not making them better people. It's not making them better athletes."

Lynn Zinser contributed reporting from New York.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 25, 2013, on page B11 of the New York edition with the headline: A Timeout Jeered Round the World.
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Rhode Island House Votes for Gay Marriage

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Rhode Island House Votes for Gay Marriage
Jan 25th 2013, 02:32

Steven Senne/Associated Press

State Representative Frank G. Ferri, left, greeted supporters of the gay marriage bill on Thursday after the State House vote.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — The Rhode Island House of Representatives on Thursday handily passed a bill to legalize same-sex marriage, paving the way for a showdown in the State Senate in the only New England state where it is not allowed.

The measure, which would allow anyone to marry "any eligible person regardless of gender," passed 51 to 19 after about an hour and a half of debate. But the cheers that filled the viewing gallery were quickly tempered by the bill's uncertain future.

"It's off to the Senate now," Dennis Byrnes of Cranston, R.I., said to a fellow onlooker. Mr. Byrnes married his husband over the border in Massachusetts.

The Senate president, Teresa Paiva-Weed, is opposed to same-sex marriage, although she has committed to allow the Senate Judiciary Committee to take up the bill, which will most likely happen in the spring.

Supporters of the measure, including the speaker of the House, Gordon Fox, who is gay, hoped to capitalize on the apparent national momentum: voters in Maine, Maryland and Washington State approved same-sex marriage in referendums last November. Closer to home, advocates cited the election of new lawmakers who support same-sex marriage as a reason to put the issue in front of the General Assembly just two years after civil unions were legalized here.

"The time has come," Mr. Fox said on Thursday, drawing on President Obama's expressed support of same-sex marriage during his Inaugural Address on Monday.

But even Mr. Fox conceded that though Rhode Island is in many ways a deeply Democratic state, it is probably more socially conservative than its neighboring New England states, all of which have legalized same-sex marriage.

"It's a combination of the quirkiness of our little state, the really entrenched opposition of our Catholic Church," as well as the dominant role that the church has historically played in the state, Mr. Fox said.

Both advocates for and opponents of gay marriage vowed to use grass-roots support and direct lobbying to sway the state's senators.

"The importance of getting the bill out of the House early, and over to the Senate, is key to our strategic goals," said Ray Sullivan, the campaign director of Rhode Islanders United for Marriage, a coalition in support of the bill.

Opponents, meanwhile, were confident that the measure would not succeed.

"The Senate has always been a stalwart for protecting life, marriage and family in Rhode Island," said Christopher Plante, the executive director of the National Organization for Marriage Rhode Island, the driving force behind the opposition here.

"Rhode Island has bigger issues than gay marriage," Mr. Plante said. "Our economy remains stagnant at best, in the tank at worst. We're tied for the worst unemployment rate in the nation. There's going to be a lot of things on the agenda between now and whenever the Senate decides to take this up."

A version of this article appeared in print on January 25, 2013, on page A15 of the New York edition with the headline: Gay Marriage Bill Approved In Rhode Island House Vote.

Media files:
MARRIAGE-moth-v3.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Microsoft Reports Drop in Profits

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Microsoft Reports Drop in Profits
Jan 24th 2013, 22:07

Susana Bates/European Pressphoto Agency

Steve Ballmer, the chief executive of Microsoft, in October.

SEATTLE — Microsoft's biggest product in decades, Windows 8, helped lift sales of the company's flagship operating system business, but not enough to rejuvenate overall growth at the company.

The company, based in Redmond, Wash., said its profit declined 4 percent in the holiday quarter, as its entertainment and Office divisions saw double-digit declines in revenue. While the company has a sprawling portfolio of technology products, from the Xbox game console to programming tools, Windows 8 was its star offering over the holidays, the product's first quarter on the market.

Windows 8 sports one of the most radical redesigns of Microsoft's flagship operating system ever, with a tile-based interface intended to take better advantage of computers with touchscreens, including tablets. Apple's iPad has been nipping into sales of low-end laptop computers for some time, a trend Microsoft and its partners in the PC business desperately want to stop.

There have been mounting signs in recent weeks that sales of new computers running Windows 8 have been sluggish. Earlier this month, IDC reported that worldwide PC shipments declined 6.4 percent in the fourth quarter, as Windows 8 failed to reverse a slide in PC sales that continued throughout most of 2012.

Microsoft's sales of Windows, which powers the vast majority of personal computers, appeared to be healthier than those numbers would indicate. It said its revenue from its Windows business, which accounts for more than a quarter of total company revenue, rose 24 percent to $5.88 billion for the fiscal second quarter ended Dec. 31.

While Microsoft's sales of Windows typically closely track the performance of the PC market, Microsoft also sells Windows 8 upgrades to people with existing PCs. The company's Windows business also, for the first time, includes sales of Microsoft's own tablet computer, Surface, which it was not offering in the same period a year earlier.

"Our big, bold ambition to reimagine Windows as well as launch Surface and Windows Phone 8 has sparked growing enthusiasm with our customers and unprecedented opportunity and creativity with our partners and developers," Steve Ballmer, the chief executive of Microsoft, said in a statement.

The company said its net income for the quarter was $6.38 billion, or 76 cents a share, compared to $6.62 billion, or 78 cents a share, in the same period a year earlier.

Revenue rose 3 percent to $21.46 billion from $20.89 billion a year ago.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters, on average, had expected Microsoft to report earnings of 75 cents a share and revenue of $21.53 billion.

Microsoft shares were down 2 percent in after-hours trading.

Media files:
25soft-web-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Formally Lifting a Combat Ban, Military Chiefs Stress Equal Opportunity

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Formally Lifting a Combat Ban, Military Chiefs Stress Equal Opportunity
Jan 24th 2013, 21:33

Brendan Hoffman for The New York Times

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta signed a memo announcing a policy change allowing women to serve on the front line in combat roles, as Lt. Col. Tamatha Patterson, left, looked on.

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on Thursday formally lifted the military's ban on women in combat, saying that not every woman would become a combat soldier but that every woman deserved the chance to try.

They said that the new policy was in many ways an affirmation of what was already occurring on the battlefield, where women have found themselves in combat over the past decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that it was essential that the military offer fully equal opportunities to both women and men.

"They're fighting and dying together, and the time has come for our policies to reflect that reality," Mr. Panetta said at a packed Pentagon news conference.

General Dempsey, like Mr. Panetta, said that his views had evolved as he came into contact with women in Iraq and Afghanistan. When he first got to Baghdad in 2003 as a division commander, he said, he got into a Humvee for his first trip out of his base.

"I asked the driver, you know, who he was and where he was from, and I slapped the turret gunner on the leg, and I said, 'Who are you?'" General Dempsey recalled. "And she leaned down and said, 'I'm Amanda.' And I said, 'Oh, O.K. So a female turret gunner is protecting a division commander.'"

Mr. Panetta and General Dempsey said they had worked together on lifting the ban for more than a year and had regularly briefed President Obama on developments. They described him as highly supportive of the decision but not intimately involved in the process.

In December, Pentagon officials said, Mr. Panetta and the Joint Chiefs reached a tentative agreement that women should be permitted in combat. Mr. Panetta thought about it over the holidays and returned early this month to receive a letter dated Jan. 9 from General Dempsey strongly recommending the change.

In the most vocal official opposition to the changes, Senator James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, who is set to become the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, warned that some in Congress may seek legislation to limit the combat jobs open to women.

"I want everyone to know that the Senate Armed Services Committee, of which I am the ranking member, will have a period to provide oversight and review," Mr. Inhofe said in a statement. "During that time, if necessary, we will be able to introduce legislation to stop any changes we believe to be detrimental to our fighting forces and their capabilities. I suspect there will be cases where legislation becomes necessary."

Pentagon officials said that the different services would have until May 15 to submit their plans for carrying out the new policy, but that the military wanted to move as quickly as possible to open up combat positions to women. Military officials said that there were more than 200,000 jobs now potentially open to women in specialties like infantry, armor, artillery and elite Special Operations commando units like the Navy SEALs and Army Rangers.

If a service determines that a specialty should not be open to women, Pentagon officials said that representatives of the service would have to make the case to the defense secretary by January 2016.

Officials said repeatedly that they would not lower the physical standards for women in rigorous combat jobs like the infantry, but they said they would review standards for all the military specialties in coming months and potentially change them to keep up with, for example, advances in equipment and weaponry. Marine officials also said they might change the initial physical standards that recruits have to meet before they are sent off to boot camp.

At a Pentagon briefing about the changes, reporters asked several times about two women who entered the Marines' brutal Infantry Officer Course in Quantico, Va., last year as an experiment, since neither at the time would have been allowed to serve in the infantry. One woman dropped out on the first day, and the other withdrew later because of physical ailments, including stress fractures. Many men fail the course as well. Marine officials said they were determined to open up jobs to women as long as they qualified for them.

Pentagon officials and military officers said it remained unclear how many women would apply to join the elite commando and counterterrorism forces, and some of those combat jobs might be among any that are proposed for exclusion. A high percentage of men fail to make the cut for those units, which include the Army Rangers and the Green Berets, and Navy SEAL teams.

Army leaders said an important initiative would be to create a cohort of female officers and noncommissioned officers who could provide leadership in combat units that would be accepting female soldiers for the first time. Policies may have to change to allow those officers to move from one military specialty to another.

The Army has also conducted studies on the psychological, cultural and social aspects of integrating women into units that have long been a male-only domain. Those studies are expected to guide how the ground forces alter their base housing, training and deployment infrastructure.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: The N.T.S.B. Sees Lengthy Inquiry Into 787 Dreamliner

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
The N.T.S.B. Sees Lengthy Inquiry Into 787 Dreamliner
Jan 24th 2013, 20:49

 WASHINGTON — The National Transportation Safety Board indicated Thursday that an investigation into the failure of lithium-ion batteries aboard two Boeing 787 planes is still far from determining a cause.

Deborah A.P. Hersman, chairwoman of the board, said a battery that caught fire in a 787 parked at a gate at Logan Airport in Boston showed signs of short-circuiting and of a "thermal runaway," in which a chemical reaction begins to overheat the battery and speeds up as the temperature increases. But Ms. Hersman described these as "symptoms," and pointedly declined to say whether those problems were the cause of the incident, which, combined with a similar event in Japan, has led to the grounding of all 50 of the planes in service.

     "These are all symptoms that something's  wrong," she said. "Understanding what came first and what triggered the next thing, that's information we are working to identify."

     While there were no deaths or injuries, she said, "These events should not happen."

"There are multiple systems to prevent against a battery event like this," she said. "Those systems did not work as intended. We need to understand why."

Ms. Hersman highlighted the seriousness of the problems more bluntly than other officials have, and her comments made clear that Boeing will not be able to get its planes back in the air anytime soon.

The battery damage was so significant, she said, that investigators are having difficulty retrieving information from the battery control system.

Japanese aviation authorities are leading the investigation into the second battery incident, which occurred earlier this month on a 787 flown by All Nippon Airways. It made an emergency landing in Japan after its pilot reported a burning smell in the cockpit while smoke alarms rang.

Ms. Hersman's briefing, the first by the safety board on the batteries, fleshed out some of the questions facing the forensic engineers but did not identify any cause as particularly likely, or rule any out. And some of the tests on the design of the battery take a week to conduct, she said.

With 50 airplanes grounded and Boeing's marquee new product in limbo, engineers working for Boeing, its suppliers and government agencies in this country and in Japan are scrambling to determine what happened. But Ms. Hersman was not making any promises.

"It is really very hard to tell at this point how long the investigation will take," she said. "What I can tell you is we have all hands on deck. We are working hard to determine what the failure mode here is and what actions have to be taken."

"Lithium-ion" is a vague term that is used in the battery industry to describe a variety of chemistries. This particular battery was built specifically for the 787 and, according to the safety board on Thursday, used an aluminum strip coated in lithium cobalt oxide in its positive electrode. That is an older technology and is more prone to thermal runaway; it also generates oxygen as it heats, making combustion more likely.

 

Hiroko Tabuchi in Tokyo contributed reporting, and Christopher Drew and Jad Mouawad in New York.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions