NYT > Home Page: France and Mali Said to Push Toward Islamist Groups

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
France and Mali Said to Push Toward Islamist Groups
Jan 26th 2013, 02:11

Jerome Delay/Associated Press

Malian soldiers at an observation post near Sévaré on Thursday.

SÉVARÉ, Mali — French and Malian soldiers appeared to push farther north into militant-held territory on Friday, closing in on the eastern city of Gao, the stronghold of one of the several Islamist groups that have captured northern Mali.

Interactive Feature

Mali joined a counterterrorism partnership with neighbors.

Residents of Hombori told news agencies that they had seen French and Malian soldiers in the town, which sits 155 miles southwest of Gao, one of the three large cities in northern Mali under militant control.

An Islamist group blew up a bridge in another small town, Ansongo, near the border with Niger, according to residents and aid workers in the area, in an apparent attempt to prevent soldiers from gaining ground in that area.

French officials have been wary of disclosing the precise movements of their 2,500 troops on the ground in Mali, and on Friday a French military spokesman, Col. Thierry Burkhard, declined to confirm or deny that Malian or French forces had taken Hombori, where two Frenchmen were kidnapped in 2011. But he said that French aerial strikes were continuing against militants farther north.

The military maneuvers came as human rights investigators continued to uncover evidence of executions by the Malian Army, whose record of abandoning the field of battle and committing atrocities has raised serious questions about its fitness to fight alongside French and other international troops headed here to fight the rebels in the North.

Gaëtan Mootoo, an investigator with Amnesty International, said witnesses had given him credible testimony that the army had killed two men near the city of Niono on Jan. 18, well after the French intervention had begun.

According to Mr. Mootoo, the soldiers asked one of the men, Aboubakrim Ag Mohamed, if they could search his house. When he complied and they found nothing suspicious, they asked him to step outside. A few blocks from his house, he was shot and killed, the witness said.

Mr. Mohamed's cousin, Samba Ag Ibrahim, was executed nearby, Mr. Mootoo said, when he encountered the same soldiers. The two bodies were abandoned, and villagers buried them the next day, he said.

More people have been killed here in Sévaré, said Corinne Dufka, a senior researcher for Human Rights Watch. At least 11 bodies were tossed into a well in a suburb. The city is a garrison town, home to a huge contingent of Malian soldiers, raising the question of how so many could have been killed under their noses.

"Sévaré is a heavily militarized place," Ms. Dufka said. "It is highly likely the security forces were involved."

The problem of reprisals of perceived supporters of the rebel groups is only likely to get worse as the military offensive moves northward, where Islamist groups have spent months occupying towns. Such reprisals could have an ethnic dimension, focusing on Tuaregs, Arabs and other groups seen as sympathetic to the Islamic rebels.

"There is a rule of law vacuum, which was created by the departure from northern Mali by the institutions mandated to protect the civilian population," Ms. Dufka said. "Given the high level of ethnic tension, the risk for reprisals is extremely high, which is why nipping this in the bud is paramount."

Scott Sayare contributed reporting from Paris.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 26, 2013, on page A8 of the New York edition with the headline: French Force And Malians Advancing Into North.

Media files:
mali-moth-v2.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: ArtsBeat: SFJazz Center Opens in California

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
ArtsBeat: SFJazz Center Opens in California
Jan 26th 2013, 06:08

A crowd filled the 700-seat Robert N. Miner concert hall at the SFJAZZ Center for an opening night concert on Wednesday.Matthew Millman for The New York Times A crowd filled the 700-seat Robert N. Miner concert hall at the SFJAZZ Center for an opening night concert on Wednesday.

SAN FRANCISCO — "Congratulations," Bill Cosby told a roomful of jazz patrons on Wednesday, near the outset of the opening-night concert at the SFJazz Center here. "This is your place, you know."

The crowd, which filled the 700-seat Robert N. Miner Auditorium, laughed appreciatively at Mr. Cosby's line, which was no less welcome for being obvious. The SFJazz Center, a $64 million performance space, proudly billed as the first stand-alone building designed for jazz in this country, was being consecrated in the presence of assorted board members, capital donors and series subscribers, who all had a stake in the project. But the concert, which was broadcast on radio by WBGO and WWOZ (and online by NPR Music), was also intended for a larger audience of the jazz faithful, a global audience. If all goes as planned, this is to be their place too.

SFJazz, the Bay Area nonprofit organization devoted to presenting this art form, is celebrating its 30th season this year, and Randall Kline, its founder and executive artistic director, wanted the evening's festivities to showcase longstanding bonds. So the concert featured musicians who have a history with the organization, including the tenor saxophonists Joshua Redman and Joe Lovano and the pianists McCoy Tyner and Chick Corea. Each of this season's five resident artistic directors — the guitarist Bill Frisell, the pianist Jason Moran, the violinist Regina Carter, the percussionist John Santos and the alto saxophonist Miguel Zenón — had some integral part to play.

The SFJAZZ Center, a $64 million facility in San Francisco, is billed as the first standalone building designed for jazz in the United States.Matthew Millman for The New York Times The SFJAZZ Center, a $64 million facility in San Francisco, is billed as the first standalone building designed for jazz in the United States.

Several of the evening's highlights were touched by serendipity. Mr. Corea and Mr. Frisell, who had never played together before, fashioned an exquisite duo improvisation on the standard "It Could Happen to You." The bassist Esperanza Spalding played for the first time with Mr. Corea and the drummer Jeff Ballard. Mr. Tyner led a heavyweight quartet — with Mr. Lovano, Ms. Spalding and the drummer Eric Harland — in a version of his 1970s staple "Walk Spirit, Talk Spirit." And Mr. Moran teamed up with Mr. Harland for a spikily abstracted take on Fats Waller's "Yacht Club Swing."

Naturally, there were performances by artists from the area. The singer Mary Stallings, who grew up not far from the site of the new center, sang an arrangement of "I Love Being Here with You" with the SFJazz High School All-Stars, an education initiative. (Ms. Carter also played one song with the high schoolers, sounding effortless.) And Mr. Santos worked in several formats, including a percussion-choir version of Tito Puente's "Ti Mon Bo." (Pete Escovedo, another important Bay Area fixture, was on timbales; Mr. Cosby played cowbell.)

As for the SFJazz Collective, a rightly acclaimed flagship band, it played two numbers: "Mastermind," a metrically tricky piece by Mr. Zenón, and "Spain," one of the best-known tunes by Mr. Corea, who sat in on keyboards. (Despite its name, the Collective now has just one member who hails from the region: Mr. Ballard, a native of Santa Cruz. Its roster otherwise represents Israel, Puerto Rico, Venezuela and New Zealand, along with Philadelphia and Albany.)

The Miner auditorium, a steeply raked cube of a hall, offers a lot of promise: its sound is clear and warm from almost any vantage, and its seating plan gives an impression of intimacy even from the balcony. The architect was Mark Cavagnero, and the acoustician was Sam Berkow; both are justifiably proud of their work here. This long-awaited enterprise is off to a bang-up start.

A version of this article appeared in print on 01/25/2013, on page C4 of the NewYork edition with the headline: Jazz Faithful Come Together for a Glimpse of the Future.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Venezuela Prison Riot Said to Have Killed Dozens

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Venezuela Prison Riot Said to Have Killed Dozens
Jan 26th 2013, 04:10

CARACAS (Reuters) - A jail riot in southwestern Venezuela killed dozens of people on Friday, local media reported, the latest incident in the ongoing crisis in the South American nation's crowded prisons.

Reuters

An injured man arrived at a hospital in Barquisimeto after a violent riot erupted at Centro Occidental jail in southwestern Venezuela on Friday.

Violence broke out after news of an inspection to confiscate weapons at the Centro Occidental jail, Prisons Minister Iris Varela said in a statement, without providing a death toll.

Local media reports say between 26 and 54 people were killed and dozens wounded.

A prisons ministry source told Reuters that "many" had been killed, including one national guard officer, but declined to offer more details. The source said the ministry would hold a news conference on Saturday with details.

The violence involved both a struggle between rival gangs for control of the jail and a confrontation between inmates and troops called in to calm the situation, Varela said.

Venezuelan prisons are controlled by armed gangs that have rioted repeatedly over the last several years due to disputes with jail authorities or prison leaders.

"Who is going to be blamed for this new massacre in one of our country's jails? Incompetent and irresponsible government," tweeted opposition leader Henrique Capriles.

The South American nation's 34 prisons were designed to hold around a third of the 50,000 inmates now in them, according to local prison advocacy groups. Many of the prisoners are armed and hundreds are killed each year in riots and gang fights.

A month-long siege occurred in 2011 at El Rodeo prison, just outside the capital of Caracas, when 22 died before some 5,000 soldiers restored order.

(Reporting by Deisy Buitrago and Pablo Garibian, writing by Brian Ellsworth; editing by Philip Barbara)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Diner’s Journal Blog: PepsiCo Will Halt Use of Additive in Gatorade

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Diner's Journal Blog: PepsiCo Will Halt Use of Additive in Gatorade
Jan 26th 2013, 02:26

Sarah Kavanagh, a high school student in Mississippi, started a petition to get PepsiCo to stop using brominated vegetable oil.James Edward Bates for The New York TimesSarah Kavanagh, a high school student in Mississippi, started a petition to get PepsiCo to stop using brominated vegetable oil.

PepsiCo announced on Friday that it would no longer use an ingredient in Gatorade after consumers complained.

The ingredient, brominated vegetable oil, which was used in citrus versions of the sports drink to prevent the flavorings from separating, was the object of a petition started on Change.org by Sarah Kavanaugh, a 15-year-old from Hattiesburg, Miss., who became concerned about the ingredient after reading about it online. Studies have suggested there are possible side effects, including neurological disorders and altered thyroid hormones.

The petition attracted more than 200,000 signatures, and earlier this week, Ms. Kavanaugh was in New York City to tape a segment for "The Dr. Oz Show." She visited The New York Times on Wednesday and while there said, "I just don't understand why they can't use something else instead of B.V.O."

"I was in algebra class and one of my friends kicked me and said, 'Have you seen this on Twitter?' " Ms. Kavanaugh said in a phone interview on Friday evening. "I asked the teacher if I could slip out to the bathroom, and I called my mom and said, 'Mom, we won.' "

Molly Carter, a spokeswoman for Gatorade, said the company had been testing alternatives to the chemical for roughly a year "due to customer feedback." She said Gatorade initially was not going to make an announcement, "since we don't find a health and safety risk with B.V.O."

Because of the petition, though, Ms. Carter said the company had changed its mind, and an unidentified executive there gave Beverage Digest, a trade publication, the news for its Jan. 25 issue.

Previously, a spokesman for PepsiCo had said in an e-mail, "We appreciate Sarah as a fan of Gatorade, and her concern has been heard."

Brominated vegetable oil will be replaced by sucrose acetate isobutyrate, an emulsifier that is "generally recognized as safe" as a food additive by the Food and Drug Administration. The new ingredient will be added to orange, citrus cooler and lemonade Gatorade, as well Gatorade X-Factor orange, Gatorade Xtremo citrus cooler and a powdered form of the drink called "glacier freeze."

Ms. Carter said consumers would start seeing the new ingredient over the next few months as existing supplies of Gatorade sell out and are replaced.

Health advocates applauded the company's move. "Kudos to PepsiCo for doing the responsible thing on its own and not waiting for the F.D.A. to force it to," said Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Mr. Jacobson has championed the removal of brominated vegetable oil from foods and beverages for the last several decades, but the F.D.A. has left it in a sort of limbo, citing budgetary constraints that it says keep it from going through the process needed to formally ban the chemical or declare it safe once and for all.

Brominated vegetable oil is banned as a food ingredient in Japan and the European Union. About 10 percent of drinks sold in the United States contain it, including Mountain Dew, which is also made by PepsiCo; some flavors of Powerade and Fresca from Coca-Cola; and Squirt and Sunkist Peach Soda, made by the Dr Pepper Snapple Group.

PepsiCo said it had no plans to remove the ingredient from Mountain Dew and Diet Mountain Dew, both of which generate more than $1 billion in annual sales.

Heather White, executive director at the Environmental Working Group, said of PepsiCo's decision, "We can only hope that other companies will follow suit." She added, "We need to overhaul how F.D.A. keeps up with the latest science on food additives to better protect public health."

Ms. Kavanaugh agreed. "I've been thinking about ways to take this to the next level, and I'm thinking about taking it to the F.D.A. and asking them why they aren't doing something about it," she said. "I'm not sure yet, but I think that's where I'd like to go with this."

Media files:
Gatorade-moth-v2.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Crime Scene: An iPhone Is Stolen, Then Restolen

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Crime Scene: An iPhone Is Stolen, Then Restolen
Jan 26th 2013, 01:56

Stealing someone's iPhone or iPad has become known as "Apple picking," and New York City is quite the bountiful orchard.

Apples are picked on crowded subways, in quiet parks, on busy street corners, in loud bars. Apples are picked while people are talking on the phone, the picker dashing past and doing the deed in midstride.

It has gotten so bad, the police have said, that if it weren't for Apple picking, crime would have been down last year, when there were almost 16,000 thefts, accounting for 14 percent of all crimes.

But even jaded police officers who have seen more than their fair share of iPhone and iPad thefts were shaking their heads over one stunning robbery that unfolded recently in Brooklyn.

This particular Apple was not just picked, it was picked twice, a white blur as it flew from hand to hand to hand on the same afternoon. And one of those hands seemingly belonged to that timeless character from countless police stories: the dumb criminal.

It was Nov. 23, a little before 4 p.m., and a 16-year-old girl was walking through Prospect Park near her home, holding her iPhone. It was an iPhone 4S — not even one of the newest ones. Her parents had warned her about the phone's distracting her in public. The ears through which those words had traveled, in one and out the other, were stuffed with white ear buds blasting the hip-hop song "Definition."

As she neared a pond, three boys about her age approached. One wore pink sneakers. A boy grabbed the iPhone, and the girl pulled it back, and the boy pulled harder. The brief tug of war ended with the boy winning. "I just kind of gave them a dirty look and they left," the girl said this week, asking that her name be withheld from this article.

iPhones are popular to steal because they can be easily reprogrammed and then sold on the black market. The victim of this particular iPhone crime turned and went back through the park the way she had come. She saw two police officers standing nearby and told them what had happened. The officers drove her around the park for a while, looking down paths and roads, but there was no sign of the boys.

They had split up. The one carrying the stolen phone took it to Flatbush. He showed it to a man on Bedford Avenue who seemed interested in buying it. But instead, the man simply snatched the phone from the boy and ran away.

The story would pretty much end right here, an uncorroborated, urban fable of caution and comeuppance, were it not for what the aggrieved boy decided to do next.

He flagged down a police car.

"He portrays himself as being a complainant," said Sgt. Arnoldo Martinez, who was working that day. "A victim."

The man suspected of taking the phone from the boy had not gotten far, and the officers arrested him in short order. They took him, and the boy, to the 70th Precinct station house.

Several blocks away, the girl was still driving with officers from the neighboring 78th Precinct, which covers Prospect Park. There was no sign of the boys, and after about an hour, one of the officers, Denisse Pacheco, suggested calling the girl's stolen phone. The girl gave her the number, and Officer Pacheco dialed.

In the 70th Precinct station house, the phone rang. One officer who had arrested the man in Flatbush answered and said, "Hello?"

Officer Pacheco assumed she was speaking to the thief, and she pretended to be the victim, looking to make a deal. "I was like: 'Hey, you have my phone. Can I have it?' " she recalled this week. " 'Can we meet up?' "

Confused, the other officer identified himself.

"You're a cop?" Officer Pacheco asked, suspicious. "From where?"

"The seven-oh," the officer replied, reciting each digit of his precinct in the manner in which officers are trained.

"Oh," Officer Pacheco said, satisfied. "I'm from the seven-eight."

The officer from the 70th Precinct said, "I have a complainant."

So do I, Officer Pacheco said.

They came up with a plan.

The officers with the boy, who still believed he was being treated as a victim, asked him to step outside the station house. Officers chatted with him to keep him occupied. Officer Pacheco and the girl drove over and parked across the street.

The girl took one look at the boy's pink sneakers and said he was one of the boys who stole her phone. Her claims were further bolstered when she was able to unlock the phone with her PIN. The boy, asked to do the same, failed, and a second set of handcuffs was called into service that afternoon. The boy's name was not released because he is a juvenile. The older suspect was identified as Jean Louis Colsun.

Officers returned the iPhone to the girl, and its disproportionate contribution to a spike in crime came to an end. The girl said that as of Thursday morning, two months later, the phone had not been stolen again.

E-mail: crimescene@nytimes.com

Twitter: @mwilsonnyt

A version of this article appeared in print on January 26, 2013, on page A14 of the New York edition with the headline: A Smartphone So Tempting That Even Its Thief Was Robbed .

Media files:
CRIMESCENE-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Catholics Raise Issue of Guns Amid Call to End Abortion

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Catholics Raise Issue of Guns Amid Call to End Abortion
Jan 26th 2013, 02:08

Christopher Gregory/The New York Times

Anti-abortion protesters flooded the National Mall in Washington on Friday for the annual March for Life. Many Catholic leaders and theologians are asking why many of those who call themselves "pro-life" have been silent when it comes to gun control.

The March for Life in Washington on Friday renewed the annual impassioned call to end legalized abortion, 40 years after the Roe v. Wade decision. But this year, some Roman Catholic leaders and theologians are asking why so many of those who call themselves "pro-life" have been silent, or even opposed, when it comes to controlling the guns that have been used to kill and injure millions of Americans.

The activists made their way up Constitution Avenue toward the Supreme Court.

More than 60 Catholic priests, nuns, scholars and two former ambassadors to the Vatican sent a letter this week saying that if marchers and politicians truly want to defend life they should support "common-sense reforms to address the epidemic of gun violence in our nation."

They called in particular on Catholic lawmakers, naming the House speaker, John A. Boehner, and Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, both Republicans, as well as Senators Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, both Democrats, who they said have "A" ratings from the National Rifle Association, to stand up to the gun lobby. They urged support for legislation limiting the sale of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, like those used in the massacre last month at a school in Newtown, Conn.

"We're addressing life," said one of the signers, Thomas P. Melady, a Republican who served as ambassador to the Holy See under the first President George Bush. "I accept the Catholic teachings, which promote the sanctity of life from conception to natural death. And certainly the death of the 20 young kids and 6 adults in Newtown was not natural. Why can't we take some steps with regards to these killings? These sophisticated weapons should be controlled."

A theologian who signed the letter, Tobias Winright, an associate professor of theological ethics at St. Louis University, a Catholic institution, said that Pope John Paul II promoted the notion of a "culture of life" that encompassed opposition to abortion as well as euthanasia and the death penalty.

Professor Winright, a former law enforcement officer, said he was encouraged when the Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, recently praised American religious leaders and the Obama administration for proposals to limit guns.

Jeanne Monahan, the president of the March for Life Education and Defense Fund, which organizes the march, said that as a Catholic in the anti-abortion movement, "We absolutely support the idea of being pro-life from conception to natural death."

"Really, the difference between the little ones in Connecticut, which is so heartbreaking, and the little ones in the womb is their size and their age."

But asked about the letter from the Catholic leaders, she said: "I definitely have nothing to say about gun control. That's so out of the parameter of what we're about."

Since the killings in Newtown, a broad spectrum of religious leaders have joined Faiths United to Prevent Gun Violence to demand controls on guns, but leaders of evangelical churches have been conspicuously absent. The National Association of Evangelicals surveyed its board of more than 100 members in December and found that 73 percent of them said that government should increase gun regulations. However, the association has not taken a position publicly.

A poll released this week by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, found that among the roughly two-thirds of white evangelical Protestants who say the term "pro-life" describes them very well, 64 percent are opposed to stricter gun control laws, while 33 percent favor them.

The picture among Catholics is the opposite. The poll found that of the 4 in 10 Catholics who say that "pro-life" describes them very well, 61 percent support stricter gun control laws and 33 percent oppose them. The survey was taken in January and included more than 1,000 respondents with a margin of error of plus or minus four percentage points.

The nation's Catholic bishops supported the unsuccessful effort to renew the ban on assault weapons that expired in 2004 and recently reiterated a call to control the sale and use of firearms, said Kathy Saile, the director of the bishops' office of domestic social development.

"It wasn't a tough call," Ms. Saile said. "All of our policy work is rooted in our consistent ethic for life, and our belief in the sacredness of all life."

Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York, the president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, told the Catholic News Service this month that he had told Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who is managing the White House response to the recent shootings, that the bishops would assist in "the fight for greater gun control in the country."

But John Gehring, the Catholic program director at Faith in Public Life, a liberal advocacy group in Washington, said that bishops who had demanded that Catholic legislators vote against abortion rights should do the same on gun control.

He said, "Catholic lawmakers who call themselves pro-life and are pretty cozy with the N.R.A. shouldn't be getting a free pass."

A version of this article appeared in print on January 26, 2013, on page A9 of the New York edition with the headline: In Fight Over Life, A New Call By Catholics.

Media files:
MARCH-1-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: 15 L.I.R.R. Employees Arrested in Copper Wire Theft

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
15 L.I.R.R. Employees Arrested in Copper Wire Theft
Jan 26th 2013, 01:44

MINEOLA, N.Y. — Investigators say the scheme spanned three years, uncoiling months before a blizzard whipped the region's transit systems and continuing until two weeks ago, with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority still reeling from Hurricane Sandy.

Over that time, officials said Friday, 17 men, including 15 employees of the Long Island Rail Road, played a role in what has become a common and lucrative crime: stealing copper, a metal whose value has risen significantly. In this case, the men were accused of taking wire from a rail yard, while on duty; using agency trucks to transport the material to personal vehicles; and selling the wire, for cash, to a local scrap metal company — a routine that netted the group more than $250,000.

"These employees stole from everyone who uses the M.T.A.," Kathleen M. Rice, the district attorney for Nassau County, said at a news conference.

The 17 defendants were arrested on Friday, in the culmination of an investigation, called Operation Heavy Metal, led by the authority's inspector general, Barry L. Kluger, who received a tip about the theft last year.

This was not the first illicit scheme at the railroad. Several retired workers have been charged in recent years with federal crimes for falsely claiming to be disabled to collect federal disability pensions — a plot that could have cost the Railroad Retirement Board, which awards disability pensions, more than $1 billion if all of the money had been disbursed.

At the news conference, Helena Williams, the railroad's president, turned to Mr. Kluger during her remarks. "Barry," she said, "unfortunately, I speak to you more often than I want to."

The latest scheme, while smaller in scale, was uncovered at a moment when riders might already have diminishing patience for the transportation authority. The agency remains a long way from repairing all damage sustained during the hurricane, and higher fares and tolls will take effect in March.

"At a time when riders are weeks away from yet another fare increase and budgets are balanced with the narrowest of margins, these thefts are particularly reprehensible," said Mark Epstein, the chairman of the Long Island Rail Road Commuter Council.

The workers arrested on Friday came from the railroads communication department, officials said, and included two assistant foremen whose annual base salaries were around $80,000. (The remaining workers earned about $65,000 to $70,000 annually, as well as overtime, Mr. Kluger said.)

Investigators said the stolen wire included new spools, severed sections of spools and discarded copper wire that the railroad was gathering to sell for scrap. The price the defendants were paid, Ms. Williams said, depended on whether the wire was new, if it contained lead and if the surrounding plastic coating was stripped away.

The workers have been suspended without pay. Ms. Williams said that if they were convicted, the railroad would fire them and move to terminate their pensions.

She added that the railroad would immediately alter security guidelines to prevent future thefts — increasing video surveillance of yards and shops and providing more secure storage bins on agency grounds.

"There were bins," Ms. Williams said of the agency's previous storage accommodations. "Unfortunately, they were open bins."

Lawyers for some of the workers sought to play down the allegations, arguing that many of the materials in question were of little use to the authority anyway.

Anthony La Pinta, whose client Craig Borsetti is accused of lending his license to the railroad workers to facilitate sales, said he was flabbergasted by the resources expended to investigate "what many would consider to be the theft and sale of garbage."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Education Department Clarifies Law on Disabled Athletes’ Access to School Sports

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Education Department Clarifies Law on Disabled Athletes' Access to School Sports
Jan 26th 2013, 02:00

The Education Department's Office for Civil Rights clarified legal obligations Friday for school districts in providing access to sports for students with disabilities.

The guidance concerns Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, a law that deals with the rights of disabled people who participate in activities that receive federal dollars.

A school district "is required to provide a qualified student with a disability an opportunity to benefit from the school district's program equal to that of students without disabilities," according to the Education Department.

Advocates for disabled athletes, some of whom have pressed legal claims against state athletic associations in recent years, praised the clarification of rules and said that as a result, participation for disabled athletes could rise.

"This is a landmark moment for students with disabilities," Terri Lakowski, chief executive of Active Policy Solutions, a Washington-based advocacy group, said. "It will do for kids with disabilities what Title IX did for women. This level of clarity has been missing for years."

At least 12 states have passed laws in recent years requiring schools to include disabled students in sports and other extracurricular programs, and the Education Department's guidance is considered to be a complement to those laws.

"Taking them together with the state laws means more opportunities for disabled athletes," Lakowski said. "With Title IX, we learned that if you build it, they will come."

According to the department, a district's legal obligation to comply "supersedes any rule of any association, organization, club or league that would render a student ineligible to participate, or limit the eligibility of a student to participate" based on disability.

A 2010 report from the Government Accountability Office found that students with disabilities participated in athletics at consistently lower rates than students without disabilities. Administrators at districts surveyed by the office said they "lacked information and clarity regarding their responsibilities to provide opportunities" under the law.

Every student with a disability is not guaranteed a spot on an athletic team for which other students must try out, according to the Education Department. But districts must "afford qualified students with disabilities an equal opportunity for participation in extracurricular athletics in an integrated manner to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the student."

The department offered specific examples of what would be a violation of Section 504 with a focus on integrating disabled athletes onto teams alongside their able-bodied peers.

Kareem Dale, a special assistant to President Obama for disability policy, said in a call with reporters that athletic activity can help students gain character, confidence and interpersonal skills, and learn how to function in a team environment.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Looking to Israel for Clues on Women in Combat

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Looking to Israel for Clues on Women in Combat
Jan 25th 2013, 22:12

Eliana Aponte/Reuters

Racheli Levantal, left, an Israeli platoon commander, checked a soldier's weapon during a training session at a military base in southern Israel in 2007.

JERUSALEM — One of her fellow soldiers lay dead, and her Humvee was being fired upon. She saw one of the attackers — three armed men who had penetrated Israel's border with Egypt — reach toward his waist. Fearing he was about to detonate a suicide belt, she fired two shots at his head.

"Once you come face to face, at that very moment, you don't think twice," the soldier, who can be identified under military rules only as S., told the Israeli news site Ynet when she received a citation for her performance in the skirmish. "There is no room for hesitation, and there is no room for mistakes."

The Israeli news media heralded S. as proof that integrating women into combat roles had been a success. But the next day, the story shifted: Another woman in the unit, the one who radioed in the attack, had cowered behind a bush for an hour and a half, as her comrades feared she had been kidnapped or killed.

As the United States moves to integrate more women into combat roles, some have looked to Israel, which on paper has one of the most gender-neutral militaries in the world, starting with a universal draft (although, since many do civilian service instead, only half of women enlist, compared with 70 percent of the nation's men). But the episode near Mount Harif in September highlighted some of the complex realities behind the policies of the Israel Defense Forces, where it remains rare for women to kill or be killed, and questions persist about their fitness.

While more than 92 percent of I.D.F. jobs are now open to women — they are fighter pilots, infantry officers, naval captains and Humvee drivers — just 3 percent serve in combat roles.

"It's not really open," said Yehuda Segev, a retired businessman and a general in the Army reserves who in 2007 headed a committee on women in the military. "They don't make the right path for women that they can volunteer and join the combat units."

Mr. Segev said the military's chief of staff rejected his committee's recommendation that all jobs — including paratrooper and other elite units like Golani and Nahal — be integrated, adding: "The Army has a lot of excuses."

Still, Lt. Col. Avital Leibovich said "the military really did a revolution" since she joined up more than 20 years ago, when the vast majority of female soldiers served in human resources or educational posts. Today, about half the I.D.F.'s lieutenants are women, as are 13 percent of those at or above the rank of lieutenant colonel. "You see more and more women in the battalions and the brigades," said Colonel Leibovich, an I.D.F. spokeswoman.

Women served alongside men in ground forces in the paramilitary groups that predated Israel's foundation as a state in 1948. For the next 25 years, they were mostly relegated to roles as administrators, medical assistants or trainers, but after the Yom Kippur War in 1973, they began serving as combat instructors and officers.

A major turning point came in 1995, when a woman named Alice Miller petitioned the Supreme Court for access to pilot training school. The first woman graduated from the school in 1998.

During war between Israel and Hezbollah in 2006, a female air force mechanic was killed in a chopper crash. In 2011, in a widely noted episode, a medic used her bra as a tourniquet after a terrorist attack on a bus near the Egyptian border.

The main combat unit for women is Caracal, named for a desert cat that looks similar whether male or female. Since its founding in 2000, the unit, which has been up to two-thirds female, has guarded the borders with Jordan and Egypt, and was the one involved in the Mount Harif episode. While most female soldiers serve two years, women in Caracal are required to serve three, like the unit's men.

Arielle Werner, 21, who grew up in Minnesota and immigrated to Israel in order to join the combat unit, said female recruits underwent the same training regimen as the men, except for occasionally shorter runs or treks with full regalia. "Once in a while we can guilt the guys into doing the heavy lifting" of huge water bottles or stretchers, she said, "but girls do the same as guys; it's pretty equal."

Still, Ms. Werner said she found herself running faster when in a coed group. "There's a lot of pressure on the women to be just as good as the men because we have a lot to prove," she explained. "There's always a question of could they shut down the unit if we don't do as well. You don't see them threatening to shut down the paratroopers."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: On Washington: Rubio and Paul Embody Conservative Debate Over Foreign Policy

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
On Washington: Rubio and Paul Embody Conservative Debate Over Foreign Policy
Jan 25th 2013, 22:15

Senator Rand Paul was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's staunchest critic during her hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday.Christopher Gregory/The New York Times Senator Rand Paul was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's staunchest critic during her hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday.

Both were propelled into the Senate in 2010 by the passion of the Tea Party movement. Both are possible contenders for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. And both are now trying to develop their commander in chief credentials through their seats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where they had high-profile opportunities this week to engage on the big issues of the moment.

But Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky are a study in contrasts when it comes to national security policy, embodying a broader debate within the conservative movement.

Mr. Rubio is challenging the strain of isolationism emanating from some grass-roots conservatives and building a reputation as an internationalist willing to deploy American power – he has advocated greater American support for the anti-Assad forces in Syria, criticized President Obama for not sustaining a sufficient American commitment in Libya and suggested that the only way to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons might be military action.

But echoing his posture on issues like immigration, he acknowledges that he is as likely to have differences of opinion on foreign policy with his conservative supporters at home and his fellow Republicans in Congress as with Mr. Obama. He sees a valuable role for global institutions like the United Nations, supports operating when possible alongside allies, and sees foreign aid as generally delivering a solid return on investment for the United States.

"Which conservative principles are we furthering by advocating disengagement from the world?" Mr. Rubio asked during an appearance last year at the Council on Foreign Relations.

"On the contrary, I think those of us who believe America has been a source of good in the world would argue that America needs to continue to play an important role in the world, as would many of our allies and even non-allies," he said. "I'm not prepared to cede the conservative label to those who would disengage us from what is going on around the planet."

Mr. Paul eschews the isolationist label attached to him by his association with his father, former Representative Ron Paul of Texas, whose antiwar, inward-turning stances defined his national reputation. But Senator Paul nonetheless reflects the deep suspicion about global entanglements evident among libertarians and some Tea Party adherents, and in some ways is a perfect foil for Mr. Rubio's efforts to position himself as a moderate, mainstream leader of a new generation of Republican leaders on foreign policy.

Mr. Paul questions the value of foreign aid and the need for permanent overseas military bases. He is calling for more restrictions on presidential power to wage war, opposes American involvement in Syria and is noticeably less hawkish toward Iran than many of his fellow Republicans. As the lone member of the Senate to vote against a resolution last fall declaring that Iran could never acquire a nuclear weapon, he said, "A vote for this resolution is a vote for the concept of pre-emptive war."

Taken together, these freshmen senators are a case study in how the conservative movement remains split over how best to employ America's power in the world.

Both are grappling with how to reconcile the aggressiveness of the neoconservatives, the fervor of the evangelicals, the warnings of overextension by fiscal conservatives and the efforts by traditional Republican "realists" to impose a more pragmatic, less ideological lens onto the party's approach. And with seats on the Foreign Relations Committee alongside advocates of assertive American foreign policy like Senator John McCain of Arizona, they have a platform to air their views, as they did this week in hearings on the security failures that led to the deaths of Americans at the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, and on the nomination of Senator John Kerry to be secretary of state.

"Looking at the Republican Party as a whole, the center of gravity is much closer to where Rubio is," said Robert Kagan, a foreign policy scholar whose thinking has shaped the views of many prominent Republicans, including Mitt Romney and Mr. Rubio.

"What Rubio represents is a particularly articulate defense of a position that has been central to the Republican Party for some period, certainly going back to Reagan," Mr. Kagan said, citing Mr. Rubio's position on promoting democratic values and projecting military strength. "Rand Paul is more of an outlier, just like his father was, but the fact that he's chosen to be on the committee means he wants to be part of the debate and wants to run on this. It will be an interesting debate to have."

Mr. Paul appears to be distancing himself in some ways from the political brand of his father, whose followers – mostly libertarians and Tea Party proponents of smaller government – are also the core of his own potential national political base.  Especially concerned about his reputation for not being sufficiently supportive of Israel, Senator Paul recently traveled to Israel for the first time, seeking to address concerns about his stance, in particular among evangelicals.

He backed the stance of the conservative Israeli government on settlements, and after returning , he told the conservative media outlet Breitbart.com that an attack on Israel should be considered an attack on the United States.

Mr. Paul has also sought to explain that his opposition to foreign aid is directed mostly at nations that he considers to be acting against American interests and values, including Egypt and Pakistan. He has backed tighter sanctions against Iran, even as he has protested the possibility of a rush to war. And as he showed at one of the hearings by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this week, he is fully prepared to score partisan points on national security issues, telling Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton that he would have dismissed her over her handling of security at the Benghazi Mission.

Mr. Rubio, too, is willing to jump into the partisan fray. In questioning Mr. Kerry, he suggested that he did not see a cohesive worldview in Mr. Obama's foreign policy. But without taking on Mr. Paul directly, he has also sought out opportunities to portray himself as willing to take on the forces in his own party that would have the United States withdraw more from the world stage.

"My role, as someone who was elected with a lot of support from a lot of people who maybe have a different point of view than I do on foreign relations, is to lead, to go to them and make these arguments and try to convince people," Mr. Rubio said during his appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations last year. "I have an obligation, as all of us do who are involved in Republican politics and the conservative movement, to argue about what America's role in the world should be."


Follow Richard W. Stevenson on Twitter at @dickstevenson.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: 40 Years After Roe v. Wade, Thousands March to Oppose Abortion

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
40 Years After Roe v. Wade, Thousands March to Oppose Abortion
Jan 25th 2013, 22:01

Drew Angerer/The New York Times

Pro-life activists made their way down Constitution Avenue toward the Supreme Court during the March for Life in Washington on Friday.

WASHINGTON — Three days after the 40th anniversary of the decision in Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion, thousands of abortion opponents from around the country came to the National Mall on Friday for the annual March for Life rally, which culminated in a demonstration in front of the Supreme Court building.

On a gray morning when the temperature was well below freezing, the crowd pressed in close against the stage to hear more than a dozen speakers, who included Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council; Representative Diane Black, Republican of Tennessee, who recently introduced legislation to withhold financing from Planned Parenthood, and Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky; Cardinal Seán Patrick O'Malley of Boston; and Rick Santorum, the former senator from Pennsylvania and Republican presidential candidate.

Mr. Santorum spoke of his wife's decision not to have an abortion after they learned that their child — their daughter Bella, now 4 — had a rare genetic disorder called Trisomy 18.

"We all know that death is never better, never better," Mr. Santorum said. "Bella is better for us, and we are better because of Bella."

Jeanne Monahan, the president of the March for Life Education and Defense Fund, said that the march was both somber and hopeful.

"We've lost 55 million Americans to abortion," she said. "At the same time, I think we're starting to win. We're winning in the court of public opinion, we're winning in the states with legislation."

Though the main event officially started at noon, the day began much earlier for the participants, with groups in matching scarves engaged in excited chatter on the subway and gaggles of schoolchildren wearing name tags around their necks. Arriving on the Mall, attendees were greeted with free signs ("Defund Planned Parenthood" and "Personhood for Everyone") and a man barking into a megaphone, "Ireland is on the brink of legalizing abortion, which is not good."

The march came two months after the 2012 campaign season, in which social issues like abortion largely took a back seat to the focus on the economy. But the issue did come up in Congressional races in which Republican candidates made controversial statements about rape or abortion. In Indiana, Richard Mourdock, a Republican candidate for the Senate, said in a debate that he believed that pregnancies resulting from rape were something that "God intended," and in Illinois, Representative Joe Walsh said in a debate that abortion was never necessary to save the life of the mother because of "advances in science and technology." Both men lost, hurt by a backlash from female voters.

Recent polls show that while a majority of Americans do not want Roe v. Wade to be overturned entirely, many favor some restrictions. In a Gallup poll released this week, 52 percent of those surveyed said that abortions should be legal only under certain circumstances, while 28 percent said they should be legal under all circumstances, and 18 percent said they should be illegal under all circumstances. In a Pew poll this month, 63 percent of respondents said they did not want Roe v. Wade to be overturned completely, and 29 percent said they did — views largely consistent with surveys taken over the past two decades.

"Most Americans want some restrictions on abortion," Ms. Monahan said. "We see abortion as the human rights abuse of today."

Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio, who spoke via a recorded video, called on the protest group, particularly the young people, to make abortion "a relic of the past."

"Human life is not an economic or political commodity, and no government on earth has the right to treat it that way," he said.

The crowd was dotted with large banners, many bearing the names of the attendees' home states and churches and colleges. Gary Storey, 36, stood holding a handmade sign that read "I was adopted. Thanks Mom for my life." Next to him stood his adoptive mother, Ellen Storey, 66, who held her own handmade sign with a picture of her six children and the words "To the mothers of our four adopted children, 'Thank You' for their lives."

Mr. Storey said he was grateful for the decision by his biological mother to carry through with her pregnancy. "Beats the alternative," he joked.

Last week, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America started a new Web site, and on Tuesday, its president, Cecile Richards, released a statement supporting abortion rights.

"Planned Parenthood understands that abortion is a deeply personal and often complex decision for a woman to consider, if and when she needs it," she said. "A woman should have accurate information about all of her options around her pregnancy. To protect her health and the health of her family, a woman must have access to safe, legal abortion without interference from politicians, as protected by the Supreme Court for the last 40 years."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions