NYT > Home Page: In Behind-Scene Blows and Triumphs, Sense of Clinton Future

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
In Behind-Scene Blows and Triumphs, Sense of Clinton Future
Feb 2nd 2013, 17:40

Patrik Stollarz/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton behind President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a meeting in Germany in 2011.

WASHINGTON — Last summer, as the fighting in Syria raged and questions about the United States' inaction grew, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton conferred privately with David H. Petraeus, the director of the C.I.A. The two officials were joining forces on a plan to arm the Syrian resistance.

The idea was to vet the rebel groups and train fighters, who would be supplied with weapons. The plan had risks, but it also offered the potential reward of creating Syrian allies with whom the United States could work, both during the conflict and President Bashar al-Assad's eventual removal.

Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Petraeus presented the proposal to the White House, according to administration officials. But with President Obama in the midst of a re-election bid, they were rebuffed.

A year earlier, she had better luck with the White House. Overcoming the president's skeptical aides, she persuaded Mr. Obama to open relations with the military rulers in Myanmar, a reclusive dictatorship eager to emerge from decades of isolation.

As she leaves the State Department, the simplest yardstick for measuring Mrs. Clinton's legacy has been her tireless travels: 112 countries, nearly a million miles, 401 days on the road. Historians will point to how she expanded the State Department's agenda to embrace issues like gender violence and the use of social media in diplomacy.

"We do need a new architecture for this new world: more Frank Gehry than formal Greek," Mrs. Clinton said in a speech last week that served as both a valedictory and a reminder of why she remained the nation's most potent political figure aside from Mr. Obama.

And yet, interviews with more than a dozen current and former officials also paint a more complex picture: of a dogged diplomat and a sometimes frustrated figure who prized her role as team player, but whose instincts were often more activist than those of a White House that has kept a tight grip on foreign policy.

The disclosures about Mrs. Clinton's behind-the-scenes role in Syria and Myanmar — one a setback, the other a success — offer a window into her time as a member of Mr. Obama's cabinet. They may also be a guide to her thinking as she ponders a future run for the presidency with favorability ratings that are the highest of her career, even after her last months at the State Department were marred by the deadly attack on the American mission in Benghazi, Libya.

"Secretary Clinton has dramatically changed the face of U.S. foreign policy globally for the good," said Richard L. Armitage, deputy secretary of state during the George W. Bush administration. "But I wish she had been unleashed more by the White House."

In an administration often faulted for its timidity abroad, "Clinton wanted to lead from the front, not from behind," said Vali R. Nasr, a former State Department adviser on Afghanistan and Pakistan who is now the dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

Mrs. Clinton made her first official trip to Asia, a choice that spoke to her diplomatic ambitions as well as her recognition from the start that many big-ticket foreign-policy issues in the Obama administration — Iraq, Iran, and peacemaking in the Middle East — would be controlled by the White House or the Pentagon.

In Afghanistan, several officials said, Mrs. Clinton hungered for a success on the order of the Dayton Accords, which ended the Bosnian War. But when her special representative, Richard C. Holbrooke, who had negotiated that agreement, fell out of favor with the White House and later died, those dreams died with him.

Then came the Arab awakening, a strategic surprise that eclipsed America's pivot to focusing on Asia and plunged Mrs. Clinton into a maelstrom. It tested her loyalty to longtime allies like President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and reinforced her conviction that anger at decades of stagnation, fueled by social media, would sweep aside the old order in the Arab world.

After Britain and France argued for intervening to defend Libya's rebels against Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi, Mrs. Clinton played an important role in mobilizing a broad international coalition and persuading the White House to join the NATO-led operation.

But it was Syria that proved to be the most difficult test. As that country descended into civil war, the administration provided humanitarian aid to the growing flood of refugees, pushed for sanctions, and sought to organize the political opposition. The United States lagged France, Britain and Persian Gulf states in recognizing that opposition as the legitimate representative of the Syria people, but by December, Mr. Obama had taken that step.

Still, rebel fighters were clamoring for weapons and training. The White House has been reluctant to arm them for fear that it would draw the United States into the conflict and raise the risk of the weapons falling into the wrong hands. Rebel extremists affiliated with Al Qaeda had faced no such constraints in securing weapons from their backers.

When Mr. Petraeus was the commander of forces in Iraq and then-Senator Clinton was serving on the Senate Armed Services Committee and preparing for her 2008 presidential bid, she had all but called him a liar for touting the military gains of the troop increase ordered by President Bush. But serving together in the Obama administration, they were allies when it came to Syria, as well as on the debate over how many troops to send to Afghanistan at the beginning of the administration.

Mr. Petraeus had a background in training foreign forces from his years in Iraq, and his C.I.A. job put him in charge of covert operations. The Americans already had experience in providing nonlethal assistance to some of the rebels. the plan that Mr. Petraeus developed and Mrs. Clinton supported called for vetting rebels and establishing and arming a group of fighters with the assistance of some neighboring states. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta was said by some officials to be sympathetic to the idea. Mr. Petraeus and a spokesman for Mr. Panetta declined to comment.

Wary of becoming entangled in the Syria crisis, the White House pushed back and Mrs. Clinton backed off. Some administration officials expected the issue to be joined again after the election. But when Mr. Petraeus resigned because of an extramarital affair and Mrs. Clinton suffered a concussion, missing weeks of work, the issue was shelved.

In an interview last week, Mrs. Clinton declined to comment on her role in the arms debate and stressed other steps the United States had taken. "We have worked assiduously, first to create some kind of legitimate opposition," she said. "We have been the architect and main mover of very tough sanctions against Assad."

"Having said all that, Assad is still killing. The opposition is increasingly being represented by Al Qaeda extremist elements," she said, adding that the opposition was getting messages from the ungoverned areas in Pakistan where some of the Qaeda leadership was believed to be hiding — a development she called "deeply distressing."

If Syria and Benghazi were low points for Mrs. Clinton, then the diplomatic opening to the military government in Myanmar, also known as Burma, was perhaps the biggest highlight. There, too, she initially met resistance from the White House and Pentagon as well as the Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, a stalwart supporter of Myanmar's prodemocracy leader, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Once she secured Senator McConnell's acquiescence, Mrs. Clinton sent her assistant secretary for East Asian affairs, Kurt M. Campbell, to meet the generals. When he returned, persuaded that Myanmar was poised for change, Mrs. Clinton convened a full review of whether to ease American sanctions and establish diplomatic ties.

White House aides remained wary about rewarding a repressive government. So Mrs. Clinton, in effect, made an end run, seeking out the president directly and persuading him to send her on a historic visit to the capital, Yangon, in December 2011.

"We didn't know what was going to happen," she said. "The president basically said, 'Look, I'm behind you on this.' "

While Myanmar's progress has not been without bumps, things have progressed enough that Mrs. Clinton accompanied Mr. Obama on his own visit last fall. And it was not the only bold move of Mrs. Clinton's focus on Asia. In July 2010, she provoked a sulfurous reaction from China when she announced that the United States had an interest in helping to resolve territorial disputes between China and its neighbors over the South China Sea. "There had been a lot of rhetoric about the pivot to Asia, but here was an issue where more U.S. engagement meant a lot to the region," said Benjamin J. Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser.

And yet, Mrs. Clinton's involvement has done little to quell the tensions. China feuded recently with the Philippines over a rocky shoal claimed by both countries, and farther north in the East China Sea, is enmeshed in a dispute with Japan over islands.

Mrs. Clinton insisted that her involvement had put China on notice that it could not brush off international legal norms in pursuing its maritime claims. "There's still going to be belligerence, and there's going to be a lot of very hot rhetoric," she said. "But I think we've helped support a strong case for the kind of framework we believe in."

The fruits of Mrs. Clinton's work were evident last year in the fraught, but ultimately successful, negotiation over Chen Guangcheng, the dissident who sought refuge in the American Embassy in Beijing. When an initial deal fell apart, she said she passed a note to China's senior foreign-policy official, Dai Bingguo, which said, "You and I need to talk."

Huddling in a small room, she persuaded Mr. Dai to order his deputies to go back to the table with her team. "It was incredibly intense," she said, in an observation that could apply to so many of her days as secretary of state, "but I was always confident."

Media files:
CLINTON-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: François Hollande Visits Timbuktu After His Troops Liberate City

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
François Hollande Visits Timbuktu After His Troops Liberate City
Feb 2nd 2013, 17:06

Tyler Hicks/The New York Times

Crowds gathered in Timbuktu on Saturday to welcome President François Hollande.

PARIS — President François Hollande of France arrived Saturday morning for a brief visit to the Malian city of Timbuktu, where he was greeted as a hero just days after French airstrikes and ground forces scattered the Islamists who had controlled the city for months, causing them to melt away into the rugged countryside.

Interactive Feature

President François Hollande of France in Timbuktu, Mali, on Saturday.

Residents of Timbuktu hailed President François Hollande of France on Saturday during his brief visit to the Malian city.

French flags flew in the center of the city and a crowd reported to be in the thousands chanted, "Thank you, France" and "Long live François Hollande" as Mr. Hollande swept into town, accompanied by his ministers of defense, foreign affairs and development and flanked by the Malian president, Dioncounda Traoré.

But French officials and analysts fear that jubilation may shortly give way to increased ethnic tensions and violence — and it remains unclear if French or African forces will be sent to root out the Islamist fighters that have fled from Timbuktu and other northern cities, or when such operations might take place.

"It's going to take a few more weeks," Mr. Hollande said, according to news media reports, but he insisted that security responsibilities would soon be handed off to Malian and African forces. "It is not our role to stay," he said. "Our African friends will be able to do the work that was ours until now."

France has a force of about 3,500 in the country, and about 3,000 soldiers from several African nations have flowed in since the French intervened last month. European military officers are to begin training the divided and disorganized Malian Army in the coming weeks or months, too, but it is unlikely that the African or Malian forces will be prepared to conduct operations against the militants before the rainy season, which generally lasts through August or so, meaning an offensive into the countryside might have to wait until then.

In the meantime, human rights groups have reported a number of abuses committed by Malian soldiers since the French military intervention began in mid-January, including accusations that soldiers conducted summary executions of civilians suspected of militant ties.

Since the liberation of Timbuktu and the northeastern city of Gao, there have also been widespread reports of looting and attacks against Arab and Tuareg residents, with black residents accusing them of collaboration with Islamist fighters; some of the groups under attack have reportedly fled.

Pressing, too, is the political question of the Tuaregs, some of whom have long called for an independent state in upper Mali. Their uprising last year set the stage for the militant Islamists who initially joined with the Tuaregs and overran the north.

French officials are pressing Mr. Traoré, the Malian president, to start negotiations quickly with Tuareg rebels, most of whom have now disavowed the Islamists. The majority of Tuaregs, the French believe, will agree to remain in a sovereign Mali with more guarantees of political autonomy, and the French hope that a deal will lead to early national elections; Mr. Traoré this week announced elections for the summer.

The French Foreign Ministry has called on the Malian government to open talks with "legitimate representatives" and "non-terrorist-armed groups" in the north, especially the secular Tuareg National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad, known as the M.N.L.A.

Mr. Traoré has said he is open to talks with the M.N.L.A., but only so long as it forgoes its demands for independence. French officials have pressed the group to do so.

"Mali must enter a phase of national reconciliation," said Jean-Yves Le Drian, the French defense minister, in an interview on France Inter radio last week. The groups involved in that process "must pronounce themselves against terrorism, very clearly, and against any desire for a splitting of Mali's territory," he said. "This country needs to return to democratic legitimacy. This is not yet the case." Paris would also like the presence of up to 5,000 United Nations peacekeeping troops, officials say, to further underline the international support for an integral Mali and further dilute the French presence.

Military considerations remain, though. In Washington, military and counterterrorism officials have applauded the speed and efficiency of the French-led operation, but they have also suggested that the militants may have ceded the northern cities with little resistance in order to prepare for a longer, bloodier counterinsurgency.

"Longer term, and the French know this, it's going to take a while to root out all these cells and operatives," Michael Sheehan, the Pentagon's top special operations policy official, told a defense industry symposium on Wednesday.

The Islamist fighters in Mali number between 2,000 and 3,000, officials and analysts estimate. It remains unclear how many have been killed in French airstrikes and ground operations, but a great number remain, likely occupying a network of caves and underground redoubts constructed in the mountains in the far north, near the Algerian border, analysts and officials say.

Steven Erlanger contributed reporting from Munich, and Eric Schmitt from Washington.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Spanish Leader Pledges Transparency Amid Corruption Inquiry

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Spanish Leader Pledges Transparency Amid Corruption Inquiry
Feb 2nd 2013, 17:08

MADRID — Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy of Spain pledged on Saturday to provide "complete transparency" about his own financial assets and those of other politicians in his party to refute what he described as "apocryphal" documents showing that he and others had received regular payouts from a secret parallel account maintained by the party.

Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy made a televised address at a meeting of his party's national executive committee in Madrid.

In a televised address, Mr. Rajoy said he regretted the damage that the corruption allegations had caused to his image — as well as to the image of his governing Popular Party and Spain as a whole — at a time of economic and social hardship. But he predicted that "this is as far as it will go," adding, "This party will defend itself."

Mr. Rajoy also insisted that his party had no connection to the $29 million amassed in Swiss bank accounts by a former party treasurer, Luis Bárcenas, who has been at the heart of the widening corruption scandal. His party, Mr. Rajoy said, "never gave orders to open accounts in a foreign country."

The prime minister said he would publish online his own tax returns this week. As to the financial rectitude of his colleagues, Mr. Rajoy said "all our tax contributions have been made within the strictest legality over all these years."

Analysts, however, said Mr. Rajoy's forceful defense on Saturday was to be expected and was unlikely to contain a spreading graft scandal on which the courts have yet to rule.

"The earthquake will continue because more damaging information is likely to come out, and the only way to put an end to such a scandal is to have a clear court ruling, which sadly in this country could take years," said Antonio Argandoña, a professor of economics and business ethics at the I.E.S.E. Business School in Barcelona.

Mr. Rajoy was speaking at an extraordinary meeting of his party's executive committee that he convened after El País, Spain's leading newspaper, on Thursday published what it said were excerpts from the party's parallel financial accounts, showing payments to leading party members above their official salaries.

According to the newspaper, the money came from corporate "donations," particularly from construction companies. Mr. Rajoy's name first appeared in the ledgers in 1997, shown as receiving sums averaging $34,000 a year through 2008, El País said.

After the newspaper report, Spain's attorney general, Eduardo Torres-Dulce, said the judiciary was considering incorporating the parallel bookkeeping evidence into an investigation into possible kickbacks received by conservative politicians.

While financial pressures have recently eased in Spain, the country remains stuck in a recession that has pushed the unemployment rate above 25 percent.

"Mr. Rajoy needs this scandal like he needs a hole in the head," said Nicholas Spiro, managing director of Spiro Sovereign Strategy, a consultancy based in London that assesses sovereign debt risk.

"This comes at a critical time for the Rajoy government, just as market sentiment towards Spain is improving and foreign capital is trickling back," Mr. Spiro added. "If this scandal had broken last June, when Spain announced its request for banking aid, the fallout would already have been far more severe."

Still, the scandal has come as another blow to Spaniards who have had to tighten their household budgets under Mr. Rajoy's austerity program. Mr. Rajoy recognized this on Saturday. "We cannot give to Spaniards, of whom we are asking sacrifices, the impression that we are not at the highest level of ethical rigor and scrupulous integrity," he said.

Protesters gathered Friday night in front of the Popular Party's headquarters in Madrid, and garbage containers were set on fire. A petition started on the activist Web site Change.org, demanding Mr. Rajoy's resignation, had collected more than 600,000 signatures by Saturday morning — one of several such online initiatives pushing for a political overhaul.

Such public pressure could determine whether Spain finally makes much-needed changes to the financing of political parties and the administration of public affairs, said Mr. Argandoña, the business ethics professor. "You cannot really expect politicians to cut the branches of the tree on which they sit," he said.

Indeed, even as the finances of Mr. Rajoy and his governing party have come under scrutiny, Spain's other main parties are themselves mired in fraud scandals of their own, turning the political debate into a mudslinging competition between conservative and Socialist politicians.

About 300 Spanish politicians from across the political spectrum have been indicted or charged in corruption investigations since 2008 when Spain's property bubble burst. Few, however, have been sentenced so far.

But adding to the pressure on Mr. Rajoy's government, on Friday the Spanish police's financial crime unit released documents said to show that Ana Mato, the health minister, and her husband, Jesús Sepúlveda, a conservative town mayor, had a decade ago been given several airplane tickets, hotel rooms and other gifts by a company that has been at the heart of a lengthy kickback investigation. Ms. Mato, however, defended her "absolute innocence" at the party meeting on Saturday, adding that there was "nothing new" in a police report that related to facts that had already been reviewed by Spanish courts in 2009.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Syrian Opposition Leader Confers With U.S. and Russia

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Syrian Opposition Leader Confers With U.S. and Russia
Feb 2nd 2013, 17:14

MUNICH — The leader of the Syrian opposition council, Sheik Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib, met here on Saturday with key representatives of the United States and Russia — who fundamentally disagree on how to resolve Syria's civil war — but the meetings were separate and there was no indication, officials said, that any progress had been made toward a workable plan to bring the violence to an end.

Sheik Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib, leader of the Syrian opposition council, at the conference.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Israel's defense minister, Ehud Barak, left, Saturday at the Munich Security Conference.

Moscow has been encouraged by Sheik Khatib's suggestion, which he repeated here, that he might be willing to talk to representatives of the Syrian government under certain conditions. But European and American officials expect that offer to go nowhere now that the Sheik's own colleagues in the opposition have attacked it.

The series of side meetings here at the annual Munich Security Conference seemed to confirm the fissures over what to do about Syria, including a new disagreement between the United States and some of its European allies over whether to provide the rebel fighters with more powerful weapons.

Senior European officials here said that Britain and France were both urging the Obama administration to stop blocking allies in the Gulf, like Qatar, from providing the rebels with more sophisticated arms and intelligence assistance.

The officials argue that the current Syrian stalemate means that the opposition is not winning, and Mr. Assad is not losing. An opposition with better military means could break the confidence of Mr. Assad and his allies and push him to negotiate with the opposition, the officials argue.

But President Obama, American officials here said, remained unconvinced about the positive effects of further militarizing the conflict, pointing to his recent interview with The New Republic, in which he asked, "In a situation like Syria, I have to ask, can we make a difference in that situation?" American officials fear the advanced weapons would fall into the hands of Islamists with an international agenda who have joined the fight in Syria alongside rebels focused on overthrowing Mr. Assad.

The conference, in its 49th year, is considered the premier trans-Atlantic conference for security officials and analysts.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., representing an Obama administration in transition to another term, carefully made no news in a well-received speech designed to reassure European allies of a continuing focus on European concerns despite the American "pivot to Asia."

And while Mr. Biden implicitly criticized Russia for supporting the government of President Bashar al-Assad, he gave the Syrian opposition little hope that Washington would change its mind about allowing more sophisticated arms to flow to the rebels.

Mr. Biden repeated America's demand that Mr. Assad relinquish power, which was immediately criticized the Russian foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, as "the single biggest reason for the continuation of the tragedy in Syria." And while Mr. Biden listed the $365 million in humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees and $50 million in nonlethal assistance to the Syrian opposition provided by the United States, he promised nothing that would help turn the war in their favor.

"As the Syrian people have their chance to forge their own future, they will continue to find a partner in the United States of America," Mr. Biden said.

Mr. Biden also spoke about Iran, repeating that the United States was willing to open direct, bilateral talks with Tehran over its nuclear program, but he insisted that Iran must show it is serious and that the talks would be substantive. "We're not prepared to do it just for the exercise," Mr. Biden said.

The Obama administration has been pushing for months to hold direct talks with Tehran, calculating that there is a window for diplomacy before Iran's elections in June. But in recent weeks, Iranian officials have thrown cold water on the idea. Indeed, Tehran has balked at setting a date or location for multilateral talks with the United States and other major powers.

In a sign of the intransigence of the conflicts over Syria's future, the United Nations negotiator for the country, Lakhdar Brahimi, expressed pessimism Friday during a panel discussion at the security conference. "I am much more conscious of the difficulties, of the country being broken down day after day, than I am of a solution," said Mr. Brahimi, who also met with Sheik Khatib.

Sheik Khatib — who directs a Syrian opposition council cobbled together with Washington's help, and pressure, to try to unify a fractured movement — found himself struggling last week to tamp down criticism of his suggestion that he would be open to talking with representatives of the Assad government. (His terms of participating were that 160,000 prisoners had to be released and that Syrians abroad could renew their passports.)

But his own colleagues strongly objected, saying that the talks must focus on the removal of Mr. Assad. While Sheik Khatib reiterated his offer here, saying that "as a gesture of good will, we are ready to sit at the negotiating table with the regime but we don't want their hands to be full of blood," he refused to provide any details, instead issuing a long indictment of the Assad government.

One senior European official said that even if Sheik Khatib were serious about talks with the regime, his colleagues would most likely force him to backtrack.

Sheik Khatib also called for the West to destroy the Syrian government's air power, which would require the direct military intervention Washington has ruled out.

Mr. Lavrov, for his part, expressed the standard Russian position: no international military involvement, no solution by military means, an immediate cease-fire and negotiations among all parties, including Mr. Assad. He said that the biggest threat in Syria was "the possibility that the rebels get hold of the chemical weapons" currently under Mr. Assad's control.

Mr. Biden did not speak to reporters after his bilateral meetings, and there were no briefings for the news media.

Russia, Syria's main arms supplier, has blocked three United Nations Security Council resolutions on the Syrian conflict, which has killed more than 60,000 people in nearly two years.

Mark Landler contributed reporting from Washington.

Media files:
munich2-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Marxist Group Claims Attack on U.S. Embassy in Turkey

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Marxist Group Claims Attack on U.S. Embassy in Turkey
Feb 2nd 2013, 17:18

ISTANBUL — In a statement that called the United States "the murderer of the peoples of the world," a Marxist group, with a history of political violence in Turkey, claimed responsibility for a suicide bombing at the American Embassy in Ankara.

The statement, which also denounced American foreign policy, was reportedly released by the Revolutionary People's Liberation Party, and a translation was distributed by the Site Intelligence Group, which monitors the communications of extremist groups. The message, which was released on a Web site that has previously carried statements from the group, condemned Turkey's policy of supporting Syria's rebels against the government of Bashar al-Assad.

The statement included details that were similar to those released so far by the Turkish authorities, although the group's message had a different first name for the bomber than the one given by Turkish officials and reported in the local news media.

The Turkish authorities said Saturday that the man who detonated himself at the American Embassy in Ankara on Friday, killing himself and one other, was a convicted terrorist who had twice attacked government facilities in Istanbul but was released from prison in 2002 under an amnesty program.

Officials in Ankara said Saturday they were awaiting the results of a DNA test before releasing the bomber's name, but officials in the Black Sea coastal town of Ordu identified him as Ecevit Sanli, 40, and said he was a registered citizen of their town. Authorities in Ordu said the bomber was identified by relatives through photographs.

The statement by the militant group included two photographs of the bomber (in one, he is holding an assault rifle, and a banner bearing the hammer-and-sickle communist symbol is behind him) that appeared to be the same person seen in photographs published by the news media. The group identified the bomber with the first name "Alisan."

The attack, coming in the wake of the assault on an American diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, by Islamic extremists, raised fears that it was the work of jihadists. That the bomber appears to have ties to a relatively minor Marxist group, which was responsible for political violence in the 1970s, is likely to challenge assumptions about the nature of international terrorism and the risks to American interests abroad. American officials, however, have not confirmed the identity of the attacker, nor a motive, and the United States plans to conduct an investigation.

The statement from officials in Ordu said on Saturday that Mr. Sanli spent five years in prison after being arrested in 1997 for attacking a military hostel and police station in Istanbul. He was then released in 2002 under an amnesty program for inmates with medical conditions, the statement said.

The authorities said Mr. Sanli lobbed a hand grenade during Friday's attack just before detonating himself, suggesting there were actually two explosions.

As the investigation continues, the authorities are trying to determine whether Mr. Sanli had any collaborators. The Turkish newspaper Hurriyet reported that Mr. Sanli had fled to Germany after being released from prison, and had returned to Turkey only a few days before the attack.

The group has struck American and western targets in Turkey before, including during the gulf war in the early 1990s, and in its statement Saturday, the group condemned the recent deployment by NATO of Patriot missile batteries in southern Turkey.

In a report published several days before the bombing, Soner Cagaptay, director of the Turkish research program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, warned that Turkey's support of Syrian rebels in their fight against the government of Mr. al-Assad, as well as the deployment by NATO of Patriot missile batteries, was rallying Turkey's extreme left.

"The country's political landscape still bears vestiges of violent leftist movements from the 1970s, as well as deeply anti-American ultranationalism," he wrote. Mr. Cagaptay noted that some militant left-wing groups organized protests against the Patriot missile deployment in the southern port city of Iskenderun, where protesters have fired smoke grenades at NATO troops and burned American flags.

Sebnem Arsu contributed reporting.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Obama’s Skeet Shooting Comments Draw Fire

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Obama's Skeet Shooting Comments Draw Fire
Feb 2nd 2013, 15:17

Pete Souza/The White House

In a photo released by the White House on Saturday, President Obama is shown skeet shooting at Camp David in August 2012.

WASHINGTON — President Obama has taken on N.B.A. stars on the White House basketball court, golfed at the air base that houses Air Force One and even tried to polish his legendarily woeful bowling at the presidential lanes.

But now it turns out that he has picked up a new hobby: skeet shooting at Camp David.

At least that is the way he tells it. In an interview published last week, Mr. Obama said that he and his guests shot clay pigeons "all the time" at the retreat in the Maryland mountains, a revelation that surprised many and drew a fair bit of skepticism. And then on Saturday, the White House released a photo of Mr. Obama skeet shooting at Camp David in August.

The notion of the president taking aim at targets flung into the air captivated some in the political and social media worlds at a time when he is pushing Congress to enact sweeping restrictions on assault rifles and high-capacity magazines. Conservatives scoffed, comics mocked, a congresswoman challenged him to a skeet-shooting contest, a fake picture of an armed Mr. Obama circulated on the Internet, and the White House tried to make the whole matter go away.

"It was a surprise to a lot of people in the industry when we saw that and heard that," said Michael Hampton Jr., the executive director of the National Skeet Shooting Association, whose 35,000-member rolls do not include the president. "But officially we have no idea whether he does participate or not. Only him or his people would know that."

Mr. Obama is hardly the first politician to draw scorn for boasting of experience with guns. In 2007, during his first presidential campaign, former Gov. Mitt Romneyof Massachusetts was ridiculed when he said, "I've always been a rodent and rabbit hunter — small varmints, if you will." In 2004,John Kerry, then a presidential candidate and now secretary of state, was lampooned for showing up in camouflage to go hunting less than two weeks before the election.

The latest commotion has its origins in the interview Mr. Obama gave to The New Republic, now owned by Chris Hughes, a Facebook co-founder and former Obama campaign aide. During the interview, Franklin Foer, the magazine's editor, referred to the fight over gun control and asked the president if he had ever fired a gun.

"Yes, in fact, up at Camp David, we do skeet shooting all the time," Mr. Obama said.

"The whole family?" Mr. Foer asked.

"Not the girls," he said, "but oftentimes guests of mine go up there. And I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting that trace back in this country for generations. And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake."

Mr. Obama went on to say that the reality of guns in urban areas differs from that in rural areas. "So it's trying to bridge those gaps that I think is going to be part of the biggest task over the next several months," he said. "And that means that advocates of gun control have to do a little more listening than they do sometimes."

The skeet-shooting comment caught many off guard because it is not something the president has talked about. While other presidents have used the skeet shooting range at Camp David, database searches of Mr. Obama's speeches and interviews turned up no prior mention of participating. No friend or guest has come forward in recent days to publicly describe shooting with the president.

"I would refer you simply to his comments,"Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, told reporters who asked how often the president shoots. "I don't know how often. He does go to Camp David with some regularity, but I'm not sure how often he's done that."

Asked why no one had seen a picture or heard about it before, Mr. Carney said, "Because when he goes to Camp David, he goes to spend time with his family and friends and relax, not to produce photographs."

That did not satisfy the skeptics. The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" column cast doubt on the claim, while Fox News quoted an unnamed person saying Mr. Obama had participated once during a Marine competition at Camp David but not "all the time." Representative Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, went on CNN to question the assertion.

"I tell you what I do think," Ms. Blackburn said. "I think he should invite me to Camp David, and I'll go skeet shooting with him and I bet I'll beat him."

Gun rights supporters said the president was evidently trying to reach out to gun owners to assuage their concerns about his legislative proposals.

"He clearly doesn't get it," said Chris Cox, the chief lobbyist for the National Rifle Association. "But in his effort to pursue a political agenda, he apparently is willing to convince gun owners that he's one of us, that he's a Second Amendment supporter." Mr. Cox said no one was fooled. "Skeet shooting, whether you've done it or not, doesn't make you a defender of the Second Amendment."

While White House officials privately dismissed skeptics by comparing them to "truthers" who doubted Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, even some liberals found the skeet-shooting comment hard to believe.

Jon Stewart, the "Daily Show" host, made fun of Mr. Obama's statement as well as those who doubted it. He essentially agreed with Mr. Cox that it was pointless for the president to try to reach out to gun rights supporters who do not believe him.

"The point is, Mr. President, what are you doing? Why try?" Mr. Stewart asked. "As far as most of your opponents go, no measure of detente, true or disingenuous, will ingratiate you to your opponents. It's a fool's errand."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: So, How Did Mayor Koch Do?

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
So, How Did Mayor Koch Do?
Feb 2nd 2013, 05:39

Paul Hosefros/The New York Times

Representative Edward I. Koch on Sept. 8, 1977, the day of the Democratic primary for mayor.

Ed Koch, the blunt-spoken and theatrical three-term mayor of New York City, who became a national emblem for the way New Yorkers talk and behave, often asked straphangers at subway stops to assess his record with a "How'm I doin'?"

With his death on Friday at 88, it seemed only fitting to ask that question once more — in retrospect.

There is no doubt that Mr. Koch restored the spirit of the city after years of urban decay that had crystallized in the city's near bankruptcy, and that reached a nadir of sorts in 1977 with the Son of Sam killings, a blackout and riots. Mr. Koch, a Democrat, took office in January 1978 and, with his moxie, was able to quickly create a sense among New Yorkers that someone was fighting to turn the city around.

"The city needed hope, it needed a champion, it needed a voice," said Mitchell Moss, a professor of urban policy at New York University. "Ed Koch became that voice."

Even the Rev. Calvin O. Butts III, the pastor of Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem, who tangled frequently with Mr. Koch over what he felt was the mayor's insensitivity to African-Americans, said Mr. Koch was the right mayor for his time.

"If you've got to have a mayor for New York City, you need a guy like Ed Koch because he's a rough-and-tumble kind of guy who speaks up and fights back," he said.

The Koch-era legacy is substantial. Experts cite the investment of billions of dollars in rebuilding abandoned housing, which revived desolate areas of the South Bronx, Harlem and central Brooklyn; the restoration of the city's fiscal integrity to the point where banks and government watchdogs were ready to let it manage its own finances; the rehabilitation of neglected parks; the genesis of Times Square's transformation from a sleazy, dangerous crossroads to a family-friendly entertainment and office center; the trading in of federal money designated to build a new West Side Highway for money that would buy subway trains and buses; the pressure on the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to virtually eliminate subway graffiti; and the enacting of a campaign finance law in 1988 under which candidates would limit their spending in exchange for receiving public matching funds.

On the ledger's deficit side, experts say Mr. Koch needlessly antagonized African-American New Yorkers and allowed his reputation for let-the-chips-fall-where-they-may integrity to be tarnished by corruption scandals that started in the Parking Violations Bureau and raised questions about his alliances with political bosses. Together, those failures might have cost him a fourth term.

On Election Day, Nov. 3, 1981, Mayor Edward I. Koch was swarmed by reporters after voting in Greenwich Village. Mr. Koch, who died on Friday, has been credited with helping revive desolate areas in the South Bronx and elsewhere, restoring the city’s fiscal integrity and rehabilitating its neglected parks.
Fred Conrad/The New York Times

On Election Day, Nov. 3, 1981, Mayor Edward I. Koch was swarmed by reporters after voting in Greenwich Village. Mr. Koch, who died on Friday, has been credited with helping revive desolate areas in the South Bronx and elsewhere, restoring the city's fiscal integrity and rehabilitating its neglected parks.

While opinions about the former mayor may vary, there is no doubt he left a notable mark in several areas.

HOUSING

To grasp the scope of Mr. Koch's accomplishment, consider the visit that President Jimmy Carter made in 1977 to the South Bronx, where he stood with Mayor Abraham D. Beame in a rubble-strewed patch of Charlotte Street against a backdrop of ghostly, gutted buildings. That characteristic landscape changed dramatically starting in 1986 with a 10-year plan by Mr. Koch that led to the spending of more than $5 billion on building low- and moderate-income housing and on rehabilitating vacant buildings. The program eventually created more than 150,000 affordable apartments, according to Ted Houghton, executive director of the Supportive Housing Network of New York. Charlotte Street itself was turned into a row of suburban-style ranch houses that a few years ago were selling for $500,000 apiece. There are few lots in the Bronx that sit empty anymore.

"When you walk through today's vibrant neighborhoods in Harlem, Bed-Stuy and the South Bronx, thank Ed Koch," Mr. Houghton said in an e-mail. "If it wasn't for his 10-year housing plan, we'd still be looking at acres and acres of abandoned buildings, like one continues to see in a lot of less fortunate, older Eastern cities."

PARKS

In the years before Mr. Koch became mayor, many of the city's signature parks had gone to seed — partly as a result of lack of money, but also because of a poorly administered and patronage-ridden bureaucracy. Central Park had become so dangerous it was ridiculed by late-night comedians.

Holly Leicht, executive director of New Yorkers for Parks.
Marcus Yam for The New York Times

Holly Leicht, executive director of New Yorkers for Parks.

"In the Koch administration, the parks took on an elevated position that they hadn't really had since the Robert Mosesera," said Holly Leicht, executive director of New Yorkers for Parks.

Parks commissioners like Gordon J. Davis and Henry J. Sternde centralized their department, delegating more authority to officials in the boroughs and appointing new parks administrators for Central Park and Prospect Park. Those administrators ultimately cobbled together public-private partnerships that have rejuvenated both parks. The Sheep Meadow, virtually a dust bowl when Koch took office, was turned into a green carpet, and the crumbling Bethesda Fountain into an aesthetic jewel. Adrian Benepe, who was a park ranger when Mr. Koch took office and eventually became the commissioner under Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, said a key moment was "having Simon and Garfunkel do a concert in Central Park in the early '80s, because it showed that Central Park was safe and fun at night."

CRIME

Mr. Koch's record on crime is more mixed. A few years into his tenure, crime began to recede, with murders declining to 1,386 in 1985 from 1,818 in 1980. Jeremy Travis, president of John Jay College of Criminal Justice, who was a special adviser to Mr. Koch during his third term, said gains were made by techniques like concentrating police personnel on open-air drug markets where people were brazenly lining up to buy drugs. But the unseen rise of the crack cocaine epidemic in the mid-1980s led to a resurgence, as easy profits enticed many amateurs into drug dealing and neighborhood wars broke out. The administration's response was "heroic," Mr. Travis said, but hobbled by understaffing in the Police Department — about 26,000 officers at the time — as a result of the layoffs demanded by the 1970s fiscal crisis.

Jeremy Travis, president of John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
Marcus Yam for The New York Times

Jeremy Travis, president of John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

"If you dialed 911, you couldn't get a car to the scene in time," Mr. Travis said. "An under-resourced department is not effective in fighting crime."

By 1990, the year after Mr. Koch left office, murders hit a historic peak of 2,251. The situation did not begin to be reversed until the city hired 5,000 more officers late in the administration of Mayor David N. Dinkins. Another form of crime, corruption, was spawned in Mr. Koch's Parking Violations Bureau. There were no revelations suggesting that Mr. Koch personally profited, but the scandals left a stain because they indicated he was sometimes willing to make patronage appointments to sustain the backing of Democratic bosses like Meade H. Esposito, Donald R. Manes and Stanley M. Friedman.

HEALTH

Larry Kramer, the gay rights advocate who wrote the play "The Normal Heart"about the AIDS epidemic, recently accused Mr. Koch of ignoring the disease's spread in a city with a large gay population because "he was terrified everyone would find out he was gay and he would lose his support from the real estate industry." Mr. Kramer said Mr. Koch did not "tell people to change their behavior" and refused to meet with or finance gay activists. (Though he once responded to a questioner that he was heterosexual, Mr. Koch repeatedly said that his love life was nobody's business but his own.)

Larry Kramer, a gay rights advocate.
Todd Heisler/The New York Times

Larry Kramer, a gay rights advocate.

Stanley Brezenoff, the chief executive officer of Continuum Health Partners and a former deputy mayor under Mr. Koch, offered a different picture of Mr. Koch's response to the AIDS epidemic. "It took a long time to recognize what was going on," Mr. Brezenoff said, "and as we came to grips with it we became more focused on identifying concrete steps to take." Mr. Koch, he said, agonized over a step like closing bathhouses used for promiscuous sex because it meant having to dispatch "investigators into bathhouses and spying on people in their most private moments."

One health policy decision Mr. Koch came to regret was the closing — for reasons of poor performance — of Sydenham Hospital in Harlem. Mr. Koch said in recent years that he had not fully appreciated how important the hospital was to black doctors, who often had trouble receiving admitting privileges elsewhere.

Mr. Brezenoff, who was president of the city's Health and Hospitals Corporation from 1981 to 1982, credited Mr. Koch for spurring "the renaissance" of the agency, which had been in disarray, and for focusing its mission on primary care.

RACE RELATIONS

From the beginning, Mr. Koch frequently found himself at loggerheads with black ministers and politicians. The Sydenham closing stirred enormous resentment in Harlem. So did Mr. Koch's abrasive style, which led him to call antipoverty organizers who were abusing the system "poverty pimps." He might also have realized that more than a few of his white supporters appreciated such tough talk.

The Rev. Calvin O. Butts III, pastor of Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem.
Marcus Yam for The New York Times

The Rev. Calvin O. Butts III, pastor of Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem.

"He was a politician and he knew what crowd he had to play to," Mr. Butts, pastor of Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem, said.

But David R. Jones, president of the Community Service Society of New York and a former Koch adviser, pointed out that Mr. Koch assembled the most diverse team of deputies and commissioners City Hall had ever seen, includingBasil A. Paterson,Herman Badillo and Mr. Jones. Later, he appointed Benjamin Ward as the city's first black police commissioner.

Mr. Koch also suffered because of racially charged episodes that sprang up on his watch: the 1984 shooting death of a 66-year-old black woman, Eleanor Bumpurs, by a white police officer during an eviction; the 1986 beating of three black men by a white gang in Howard Beach, Queens; the shooting death of Yusuf K. Hawkins by white youths weeks before the 1989 election.

Despite his condemnation of the mob beatings, it was hard to tamp down a sense among blacks that his public rhetoric — in the 1988 presidential campaign, for example, he said Jews would be "crazy" to vote for Jesse Jacksonbecause of his "Hymietown" slur about New York and his support for a Palestinian homeland — may have helped foster an atmosphere in which some young whites felt emboldened to commit such assaults.

Still, Mr. Koch seemed to redeem himself in his post-mayoralty. The Rev.Al SharptonJr. became a friend, and Mr. Butts, who once said Mr. Koch was "worse than a racist, he was an opportunist," said last week: "I never got the impression that he was a racist. He had his prejudices like everybody else and he allowed his temper and his I-know-what's-best-for-everybody attitude to get in the way of sound judgment."

TRANSIT

With its graffiti-coated subway cars and frequent breakdowns, the transit system Mr. Koch inherited had become one of the bleakest symbols of the city's tailspin. Ridership had fallen to its lowest level since 1917, even before the modern subway system had been completed, according to Gene Russianoff, staff attorney for the Straphangers Campaign.

While he had few direct powers to change matters, Mr. Koch harangued the Transportation Authority for its crackling, inaudible announcements; doubled, to $200 million, the city's contribution for rebuilding; and urged that dogs patrol the subway yards, an idea that was barely tried. While originally a proponent of the West Side Highway, Mr. Koch eventually fought for trading in the federal highway funds for $1 billion to buy new subway cars. The last graffiti-marked car was taken out of service in his last year in office.

A version of this article appeared in print on February 3, 2013, on page MB1 of the New York edition with the headline: So, How'd He Do?.

Media files:
03COVER-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions