Latest News

Even as profits surged, the board of JPMorgan Chase cut the pay of chief executive Jamie Dimon by 50 percent, in light of a multi-billion dollar trading loss last year.

By the overall numbers, it was a good year for JPMorgan. The bank reported a record profit of $5.7 billion for the fourth quarter, up 53 percent from 2011. Revenues, too, were strong, rising 10 percent to $23.7 billion for the period.

"The firm's results reflected strong underlying performance across virtually all our businesses for the fourth quarter and the full year, with strong lending and deposit growth," the chief executive of JPMorgan, Jamie Dimon, said in statement.

But the year was clouded by a multi-billion dollar trading loss stemming from a bad bet on derivatives. JPMorgan continues to unwind the bungled trade, which had racked up $6.2 billion in losses through the third quarter of 2012. The bank said it "experienced a modest loss" in the last three months of the year.

In light of the trading losses, the bank's board voted to reduce Mr. Dimon's total compensation. That decision was driven by a desire to hold the chief executive accountable for some of the oversight failings that led to the troubled bet, according to several people close to the board.

The board cut Mr. Dimon's total compensation for 2012 to $11.5 million from $23 million a year before. While Mr. Dimon's salary remained the same at $1.5 million, his bonus was reduced to $10 million, paid out in restricted stock.

On an earnings call Wednesday, Mr. Dimon emphasized that this latest quarter largely marks the end of the trading debacle. "We are getting near the end of it," Mr. Dimon said. Mr. Dimon acknowledged that the board "had a tough job" in assessing how to reduce his total compensation for the year. While "this was one huge mistake," Mr. Dimon said, the board had to look at "the positives and the negatives." He added that he "respects their decision."

Although Mr. Dimon's compensation took a hit, he dodged much of the criticism for the trading losses in two reports released on Wednesday. One report details the result of a sweeping investigation into the trades led by Mike Cavanagh, formerly the bank's chief financial officer, and the other outlines the board's findings.

In the case of Mr. Dimon, the reports mainly took aim at his over-reliance on senior managers. "He could have better tested his reliance on what he was told," the investigation found.

Instead, much of the blame centered on Ina R. Drew, who oversaw the chief investment unit where the trading took place. Ms. Drew resigned in May shortly after the losses were disclosed.

Under Ms. Drew's leadership, there were failures "in three critical areas," including the execution of a complex trading strategy and gaps in oversight of the large portfolio, according to the investigation. The report indicated that Ms. Drew failed "to appreciate the magnitude and significance of the changes" as the riskiness of the trades escalated.

Barry Zubrow, the bank's former chief risk officer, was also singled out. Douglas Braunstein, who left his position as chief financial officer in November, was cited "for weaknesses in financial controls." The investigation found that the organization should "have asked more questions or to have sought additional information about the evolution of the portfolio."

Despite the overhang of the bad bet, JPMorgan produced record profit for the quarter, as economic and credit conditions improved. The bank reduced the money it set aside for potential losses, adding to profits overall. And the bank notched gains in all its major divisions, showing strength in both consumer and corporate banking operations.

For the full year, JPMorgan reported earnings of $21.3 billion, compared with $19 billion in 2011. Revenues in 2012 were essentially flat at $97 billion.

Despite the rocky market conditions and uncertainty related to the budget impasse, the corporate-focused businesses reported nice gains. Investment banking fees jumped 54 percent to $1.7 billion, with improvements in debt and equity underwriting. Revenue in the commercial banking group hit $1.75 billion, following the tenth consecutive quarter of loan growth.

Income in JPMorgan's asset management group rose 60 percent to $483 million. JPMorgan has been ramping up the business, as riskier ventures get crimped by new regulation.

Like other big lenders, the bank's earnings have been bolstered by a surge in mortgage lending, driven in part by a series of federal programs that have helped drive down interest rates. As homeowners seize on the low rates, JPMorgan is experiencing a flurry of refinancing applications. The bank is also making bigger gains when those loans are packaged and eventually sold to big investors.

Overall, the mortgage banking group notched profit of $418 million, compared with a loss of $269 million in the previous year.

But those low interest rates also present a challenge for JPMorgan, which is dealing with glut of deposits. The bank reported average total deposits of $404 billion, up 10 percent from a year earlier.

As deposits pile up, the situation is weighing on profitability. The margin on deposits continued to shrink, dropping to 2.44 percent from 2.76 percent the previous year.

The bank also continues to face a slew of legal problems.

In the last year, JPMorgan has worked to move beyond some of the issues stemming from the mortgage crisis. Along with competitors, JPMorgan hashed out deals with federal regulators over claims that its foreclosures practices may have led to wrongful eviction of homeowners. Earlier this month, JPMorgan and other banks agreed to a $8.5 billion settlement with the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve, which ends a costly and flawed review of loans in foreclosure ordered up by the regulators in 2011. The bank spent roughly $700 million this quarter on costs associated with the review.

Still, the bank is dealing with other cases that could prove costly. The New York attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, filed a lawsuit against the bank related to Bear Stearns, the troubled unit the JPMorgan bought in the depths of the financial crisis. In the suit, filed in October, the attorney general claimed JPMorgan defrauded investors who bought securities created from shoddy mortgages.

JPMorgan was also hit with two enforcement actions earlier in this week, the first formal sanctions from federal banking regulators over the bank's multibillion trading loss. Regulators from the Federal Reserve and the Comptroller of the Currency, identified flaws throughout the bank, citing failures in the bank's ability to asses how big losses might swell as a result of the complex trades. In addition, regulators found that bank executives did not adequately inform board members about the potential losses.