NYT > Home Page: Egyptian Army Chief Warns of ‘State Collapse’ Amid Chaos

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Egyptian Army Chief Warns of 'State Collapse' Amid Chaos
Jan 29th 2013, 11:20

Tara Todras-Whitehill for The New York Times

Egyptians in Port Said mourned on Monday for people killed in clashes with the police a day earlier.

CAIRO — Reacting to the growing chaos in several Egyptian cities, including Cairo, the Army chief of staff warned on Tuesday of the "collapse of the state" if political forces in the country did not reconcile, reflecting growing impatience with the crisis from Egypt's most powerful institution.

Map

Egyptians opposed to President Mohamed Morsi on a seized armored police vehicle on Monday in Cairo. It was later set on fire.

Riot police beat a protester during clashes in Cairo on Monday.

Egyptians on Monday mourned the death of Mohammed Yousra, 27, one of seven people killed in clashes with the police in Port Said.

Egyptian police officers in Port Said on Monday.

The worst of the fighting, which has left at least 45 people dead, has occurred in Port Said on the Suez Canal. Egypt's president, Mohamed Morsi, has imposed a monthlong state of emergency in the city and two others in the Suez Canal zone, calling on the Army to regain control of security.

Violence in Cairo, the capital, has also begun to escalate. During clashes between riot police and protesters along the Nile Corniche early on Tuesday, the fighting spilled into one of the city's best known luxury hotels, leaving the lobby in ruins.

In comments published on an official Army Facebook page, the chief of staff, Abdul-Fattah al-Sisi, said the Army would protect the "vital" Suez Canal and warned of attempts to target state institutions, calling it a "serious matter that harms Egyptian national security and the future of Egypt."

In Port Said on Monday, street battles reached a bloody new peak with a death toll over three days of at least 45, with at least five more protesters killed by bullet wounds, hospital officials said.

The state of emergency imposed by President Morsi virtually eliminates due process protections against abuse by the police.

Angry crowds burned tires and hurled rocks at the police. And the police, with little training and less credibility, hunkered down behind barrages of tear gas, birdshot and occasional bullets.

The sense that the state was unraveling may have been strongest here in Port Said, where demonstrators have proclaimed their city an independent nation. But in recent days, the unrest has risen in towns across the country and in Cairo as well. In the capital on Monday, a mob of protesters managed to steal an armored police vehicle, drive it to Tahrir Square and make it a bonfire.

After two years of torturous transition, Egyptians have watched with growing anxiety as the erosion of the public trust in the government and a persistent security vacuum have fostered a new temptation to resort to violence to resolve disputes, said Michael Hanna, a researcher at the New York-based Century Foundation who is now in Cairo. "There is a clear political crisis that has eroded the moral authority of the state," he said.

And the spectacular evaporation of the government's authority here in Port Said has put that crisis on vivid display, most conspicuously in the rejection of Mr. Morsi's declarations of the curfew and state of emergency.

As in Suez and Ismailia, tens of thousands of residents of Port Said poured into the streets in defiance just as a 9 p.m. curfew was set to begin. Bursts of gunfire echoed through the city for the next hours, and from 9 to 11 p.m. hospital officials raised the death count to seven from two.

When two armored personnel carriers approached a funeral Monday morning for some of the seven protesters killed the day before, a stone-throwing mob of thousands quickly chased them away. And within a few hours, the demonstrators had resumed their siege of a nearby police station, burning tires to create a smoke screen to hide behind amid tear gas and gunfire.

Many in the city said they saw no alternative but to continue to stay in the streets. They complained that the hated security police remained unchanged and unaccountable even after President Hosni Mubarak was ousted two years ago. Protesters saw no recourse in the justice system, which is also unchanged; they dismissed the courts as politicized, especially after the acquittals of all those accused of killing protesters during the revolution. Then came the death sentences handed down Saturday to 21 Port Said soccer fans for their role in a deadly brawl. The death sentences set off the current unrest in this city.

Nor, the people said, did they trust the political process that brought to power Mr. Morsi and his Islamist allies in the Muslim Brotherhood. He had vowed to usher in the rule of law as "a president for all Egyptians." But in November, he used a presidential decree to temporarily stifle potential legal objections so that his Islamist allies could rush out a new Constitution. His authoritarian move kicked off a sharp uptick in street violence leading to this weekend's Port Said clashes.

"Injustice beyond imagination," one man outside the morning funeral said of Mr. Morsi's emergency decree, before he was drowned out by a crowd of others echoing the sentiment.

"He declared a curfew, and we declare civil disobedience," another man said.

"This doesn't apply to Port Said because we don't recognize him as our president," said a third. "He is the president of the Muslim Brotherhood only."

Officials of the Muslim Brotherhood and its party could not be reached. The group had recently moved offices because of security threats, and at the new office, neighbors said Brotherhood officials had not appeared since the start of the unrest.

As tens of thousands marched to the cemetery, many echoed the arguments of human rights advocates that the one-month imposition of the emergency law and reliance on the military would only aggravate the problem. The emergency law rolled back legal procedures meant to protect individuals from excessive violence by the police, while the reliance on soldiers to keep the peace further reduced individual rights by sending any civilians arrested to military trials.

"It is stupid — he is repressing people for one more month!" one man argued to a friend. "It will explode in his face. He should let people cool down."

The police remained besieged in their burned-out stations, glimpsed only occasionally crouching with their automatic rifles behind the low roof ledges.

When one showed his head over a police building as the funeral march passed, voices in the crowd shouted that his appearance was a "provocation" and people began hurling rocks. Others riding a pickup in the procession had stockpiled homemade bombs for later use.

In a departure from most previous clashes around the Egyptian revolution, in Port Said the police also faced armed assailants. Two were seen with handguns on Monday around a siege of a police station, in addition to the man with the Kalashnikov.

Earlier, a man accosted an Egyptian journalist working for The New York Times. "If I see you taking pictures of protesters with weapons, I will kill you," he warned.

Defending their stations, the police fought back, and in Cairo they battled their own commander, the interior minister.

Brotherhood leaders say Mr. Morsi has been afraid to name an outsider as minister for fear of a police revolt, putting off any meaningful reform of the Mubarak security services. But when Mr. Morsi recently tapped a veteran ministry official, Mohamed Ibrahim, for the job, many in the security services complained that even the appointment of one insider to replace another was undue interference.

In a measure of the low level of the new government's top-down control over the security forces, officers even cursed and chased away their new interior minister when he tried to attend a funeral on Friday for two members of the security forces killed in the recent clashes.

"What do you mean we won't be armed? We would be disarmed to die," one shouted, on a video recording of the event.

In an attempt to placate the rank and file, Mr. Ibrahim issued a statement to police personnel sympathizing with the pressure the protests put on them. Later, he promised them sophisticated weapons.

"That can only be a recipe for future bloodshed," said Hossam Bahgat, executive director of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, which monitors police abuses.

By turning to the military, Mr. Morsi signaled that he understood he could not rely on the police to pacify the streets, Mr. Bahgat argued.

But it was far from clear that Mr. Morsi was fully in command of the military either. The new Islamist-backed Constitution grants the general broad autonomy within the Egyptian government in an apparent quid pro quo for turning over full power to President Morsi in August. Mr. Morsi's formal request for the military to restore order was "not so much an instruction as a plea for support," Mr. Bahgat said.

It remains to be seen whether the military retains the credibility to quell the protests. The soldiers stationed in Port Said did nothing to intervene as clashes raged on in the streets hours after curfew Monday night.

Analysts close to the military say its officers are extremely reluctant to engage in the kind of harsh crackdown that would damage its reputation with Egyptians, preferring to rely on its presence alone.

Near the front lines of the clashes, residents debated whether they would welcome a military takeover. "The military that was sent to Port Said is the Muslim Brotherhood's military," said one man, dismissing its independence from Mr. Morsi.

But others said they still had faith in the institution, if not in its top generals. "In the military, the soldiers are our brothers," said Khaled Samir Abdullah, 25. Pointing to the police, he said, "those ones are merciless."

David D. Kirkpatrick and Mayy El Sheikh reported from Port Said, Egypt.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: 20 or 21 Reported Dead in Kazakhstan Plane Crash

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
20 or 21 Reported Dead in Kazakhstan Plane Crash
Jan 29th 2013, 11:04

ALMATY, Kazakhstan (AP) — A passenger jet carrying at least 20 people crashed Tuesday near Kazakhstan's principal city, Almaty, killing all on board, the airline and officials said.

The SCAT airline said the plane carried 15 passengers and five crew. The Kazakh Prosecutor-General's office said 21 people were aboard.

Officials said the plane, flying in from the northern city of Kokshetau, disappeared from radar view at around 13:13 p.m. local time (0713 GMT). The airline said the pilot was making a second approach through heavy fog when the plane crashed about five kilometers (3 miles) from the airport.

The Emergencies Ministry said the plane was a Bombardier CRJ200, a two-engine regional jet that can accommodate about 50 passengers.

SCAT said the cause for the crash will not be determined until flight recorder data are examined.

The General Prosecutor's Office said it is opening a criminal investigation into the airline.

Prime Minister Serik Akhmetov ordered the creation of a state commission to investigate the crash.

This is the second major aircraft accident recently in Kazakhstan. In December, 27 people died when an An-72 military plane crashed near the southern city of Shymkent during violent snowstorms.

SCAT, which is based in Shymkent, is banned from flying within the European Union. The company operates regional flights within Kazakhstan, a country of 16.5 million people spread across an area four times the size of Texas.

Only one airline in Kazakhstan, state-owned Air Astana, is authorized to fly to the EU.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Murdoch Apologizes for ‘Grotesque’ Netanyahu Cartoon

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Murdoch Apologizes for 'Grotesque' Netanyahu Cartoon
Jan 29th 2013, 10:20

LONDON — Rupert Murdoch, the media tycoon whose British newspaper outpost has been mired in a phone hacking scandal, took the unusual step of apologizing personally for a cartoon printed in one of his titles here, The Sunday Times of London, that depicted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel building a bloody wall trapping the bodies of Palestinians.

The drawing was published on Sunday, when Britain marked Holocaust Memorial Day.

The affair, which drew passionate debate in Britain on Tuesday, seemed to offer a mirror image of controversies in recent years involving cartoons that Muslims found to be offensive.

In a message on Twitter on Monday, Mr. Murdoch wrote that the artist who drew the cartoon, Gerald Scarfe, "has never reflected the opinions of The Sunday Times. Nevertheless, we owe major apology for grotesque, offensive cartoon."

The drawing showed Mr. Netanyahu holding a trowel and included the lines: "Israel elections. Will cementing the peace continue?" The wall in the cartoon was apparently a reference to the barrier Israel has built between itself and the West Bank.

Stephen Pollard, the editor of Britain's Jewish Chronicle weekly newspaper, said in a BBC radio segment on Tuesday that the timing of the cartoon was "grotesque." It reflected "the worst anti-Semitic blood libel," which was common in cartoons in Arabic newspapers in the Middle East, he said.

But, appearing on the same broadcast, Steve Bell, a cartoonist for The Guardian, responded in a heated discussion that when Mr. Scarfe depicted President Bashar al-Assad of Syria in a similarly confrontational light there had been "not a squeak" of criticism.

The debate also spread to Israel where columnist Anshel Pfeffer wrote on the Haaretz newspaper Web site. "Should The Sunday Times have not published the cartoon on International Holocaust Memorial Day? Only if one believes that is a day in which Israeli politicians have immunity from being caricatured."

Mr. Scarfe is one of Britain's best-known cartoonists and his works has appeared in The Sunday Times since 1967. The Jewish Chronicle quoted Mr. Scarfe as saying he "very much regrets" the timing the cartoon's publication. In a message to the newspaper, he "said that he had not been aware it was Holocaust Memorial Day," The Jewish Chronicle reported.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews, the main representative body for British Jews, said it had complained to the Press Complaints Commission, the body by which British newspapers regulate themselves.

Like, Mr. Pollard, the board said the cartoon "is shockingly reminiscent of the blood libel imagery more usually found in parts of the virulently anti-Semitic Arab press."

Initially, The Sunday Times defended its decision to publish the cartoon, British news reports said, saying it was "aimed squarely at Mr. Netanyahu and his policies, not at Israel, let alone at Jewish people. It appeared yesterday because Mr. Netanyahu won the Israeli election last week."

But Martin Ivens, the acting editor of The Sunday Times, said the newspaper would not countenance insults to the memory of Holocaust victims or blood libel, a term denoting medieval superstitions falsely accusing Jews of using the blood of children in rituals.

"The paper has long written strongly in defense of Israel and its security concerns, as have I as a columnist," he said in a statement published by the Press Association news agency. "We are, however, reminded of the sensitivities in this area by the reaction to the cartoon, and I will, of course, bear them very carefully in mind in future."

Mr. Ivens planned to meet British Jewish leaders on Tuesday to apologize in person for the cartoon.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Incoming Chinese Leader Will Not to Bargain on Disputed Territory

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Incoming Chinese Leader Will Not to Bargain on Disputed Territory
Jan 29th 2013, 09:51

HONG KONG — China will never bargain over what it deems to be "core" territorial and security interests, the country's top leader, Xi Jinping, said in his first published speech setting out his foreign policy since his elevation, which has been accompanied by volatile tensions with Japan and other Asian neighbors over rival maritime claims.

Mr. Xi laid out some of the principles likely to shape Chinese diplomacy under him in a speech to the Communist Party's elite Politburo that balanced vows of commitment to peace with a warning that certain demands are sacrosanct to Beijing.

At the heart of that message was Mr. Xi's invocation of "core national interests," a sweeping and ill-defined term that he and other senior Chinese officials have used to refer to security and sovereignty interests that they say are not negotiable. These include quelling independence movements in Tibet and the far western region of Xinjiang and eventually bringing the island of Taiwan under Chinese sovereignty.

"We must adhere to the path of peaceful development, but can never abandon our legitimate interests, and can never sacrifice core national interests," Mr. Xi said at the meeting on Monday, according to an account published by the state-run Xinhua news agency on Tuesday.

"No foreign country should ever nurse hopes that we will bargain over our core national interests, and nor should they nurse hopes that we will swallow the bitter fruit of harm to our country's sovereignty, security and development interests," said Mr. Xi.

Mr. Xi's published comments did not mention China's quarrel with Japan over an outcrop of rocky islands in the East China Sea, or any other specific foreign policy issues. But his words could reinforce nationalist expectations in China and anxieties abroad that he will press territorial claims more determinedly than his predecessor, Hu Jintao, who remains state president until March, when the national parliament will install Mr. Xi in that post.

"Yes, it's a tougher policy, saying that we're not trading our core interests," said Shen Dingli, director of the Center for American Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai.

Mr. Xi's comments were in the bounds of established Chinese policy, but he appears more willing to show an assertive position on territorial issues than his predecessors, said Jin Canrong, a professor of international relations at Renmin University in Beijing.

"These are the basic principles, just stated more clearly," Mr. Jin said. "China will be more resolute in safeguarding its interests."

"Now China's strength is greater and domestic audiences are more focused on foreign policy, hence the talk of resolute protection," Mr. Jin added.

During a visit to the United States a year ago, Mr. Xi also demanded respect for China's "core national interests." There has been controversy in Chinese policy circles in recent years over how to define core interests beyond the specific territorial issues involving Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan. Starting in 2009, some senior officials began pressing a definition of those interests that covered broader territorial claims, while some policy advisers argued that expanding the concept could entangle Beijing in needless and costly disputes.

The months before and since Mr. Xi was appointed Communist Party leader in November have been overshadowed by the feud between China and Japan over the East China Sea islands, which the former calls the Diaoyu while the latter calls them the Senkaku. In September, torrid and sometimes violent protests spread across dozens of Chinese cities after the Japanese government said it had bought islands that were in private Japanese hands.

Japan has held the islands for more than a century. But China says it has legitimate title to them, and recently has sent government ships and planes to skirt near the islands and underscore that point. Earlier in January, tensions spiked when both countries sent fighter jets over the East China Sea at the same time.

China is also locked in disputes with southeast Asian countries, especially the Philippines and Vietnam, over Beijing's territorial claims in the South China Sea that span busy shipping lanes, fishing grounds and potentially valuable gas and oil reserves.

Mr. Xi, who is 59 years old and likely to lead China for the next decade, has urged Chinese military forces to focus on training for possible conflict and stamp out lax discipline and corruption.

But on Friday, he and a visiting Japanese politician from the governing coalition signaled that their governments want to try to keep in check tensions over the islands dispute. Mr. Xi, though, also stressed he was not softening Beijing's territorial demands.

"China will take the peaceful the path of peaceful development, and other countries must also take that path," Mr. Xi said in his speech to the Politburo.

Bree Feng in Beijing contributed research.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Suicide Bomber Kills 2 at Somali President's Villa

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Suicide Bomber Kills 2 at Somali President's Villa
Jan 29th 2013, 08:37

MOGADISHU, Somalia (AP) — A suicide bomber detonated explosives inside Somalia's presidential palace compound, killing two people, an official said Tuesday.

The man blew himself up Tuesday morning when he was questioned by soldiers manning a checkpoint in the palace complex known as Villa Somalia, said Mohamed Ali, a police officer at the official residence in Mogadishu, the capital.

Villa Somalia has a large compound with several buildings and checkpoints. The bomber was four more checkpoints away from President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's home, Ali said. The president is said to be out of the country on state business. The checkpoint where the blast took place is near the home of Prime Minister's Abdi Farah Shirdon which is also in the compound, according to officials.

Two soldiers died and three others were wounded in the explosion, said Yusuf Abdi, a military officer at the palace.

Mohamud survived an assassination attempt on his second day in office in September when two suicide bombers blew themselves up while trying to gain access into a heavily guarded hotel serving as his temporary residence.

No one has claimed responsibility for the attack but it falls into a pattern of previous attacks blamed on the al-Qaida-linked rebel group al-Shabab. The extremist group has been waging an insurgency against Somalia's United Nations-backed government.

Mohamud, 56, who was an academic and activist before becoming president, is expected to form the county's first functioning central government since 1991, when warlords overthrew longtime dictator Mohamed Siad Barre.

Since 2004, Somalia has been represented by a U.N.-approved leadership structure called the Transitional Federal Government that until recently only controlled small parts of Mogadishu. That government accomplished little, but since African Union and Somali troops pushed the al-Shabab extremists out of the capital in 2011 and most parts of the country they occupied in 2012, positive momentum new stability is building.

The international community is supporting Mohamud's government saying it's a step toward moving the country out of its failed-state status but that much more remains to be done in a country bloodied by two decades of war.

In a sign of progress, the United States last week officially recognized the Somali government for the first time since Barre's fall 1991.

Mohamud faces an uphill task unifying a fractious country in the face of the Islamist radicals' insurgency and rebuilding a bombed-out infrastructure, food security and institutions. Another challenge is fighting the endemic corruption that plagued previous governments.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Outgoing South Korean Leader Creates Furor With Pardons

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Outgoing South Korean Leader Creates Furor With Pardons
Jan 29th 2013, 09:12

SEOUL, South Korea — With less than one month left in office, the outgoing President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea on Tuesday granted special pardons to a longtime friend, political allies and dozens of others convicted of corruption and other crimes, igniting a rare quarrel with the country's president-elect.

For days, the office of the incoming President Park Geun-hye had warned Mr. Lee not to "abuse his presidential power" by granting presidential pardons in his last days in office. Doing so, it said, would "go against the will of the people."

In ignoring that appeal, Mr. Lee asserted on Tuesday that he was still the president.

"This is not an abuse of presidential authority," Mr. Lee was quoted as saying by his office during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, adding that the number of people pardoned under his five-year rule — 13,000 — was far smaller than those who had won presidential clemency under his predecessors. "It is carried out according to law and procedure," he added.

The highly unusual row between Mr. Lee and Ms. Park, both members of the governing Saenuri Party, rekindled a long-running controversy over a South Korean president's power to grant special amnesty.

In recent decades, every South Korean president has exercised that power more than once a year, freeing inmates or restoring the civil rights of ex-convicts, such as letting them run for political office. Such pardons were typically given ahead of national holidays, such as the Lunar New Year's Day, which falls on Feb. 10 this year, and affected as many as thousands of people at a time.

But those who traditionally have benefited also included several politicians, big businessmen and close associates of the president, some of whom had been convicted in high-profile corruption cases. That spawned a persistent complaint from civic groups and ordinary citizens that in South Korea that the corrupt yet politically connected escaped legal justice, helping foster persistent corruption among the country's political and business elite.

South Korean presidents, during their campaigns, had often warned that those convicted of corruption should not expect special pardons. But once elected, they invariably issued a special amnesty toward the end of their single five-year term, leading the political opposition to accuse them of giving their last favor to their allies before they left office.

Mr. Lee, who will hand over the presidency to Ms. Park on Feb. 25, continued that pattern when he approved special pardons for 55 people on Tuesday.

Although that was a modest number, it included Mr. Lee's longtime friend, the businessman Chun Shin-il and his close political ally and former Cabinet member Choi See-joong. Both of them were convicted of bribery and have finished less than half of their prison terms.

The amnesty also erased the criminal records of two other allies of Mr. Lee who were convicted of bribery but avoided prison terms: Park Hee-tae, a former National Assembly speaker, and Kim Hyo-jae, a former senior political affairs aide to Mr. Lee.

Ms. Park, like her predecessors, had, during her campaign, expressed concerns about the tendency of outgoing residents to grant special pardons, and those concerns were echoed Tuesday by her aides.

"Pushing ahead with pardoning those involved in irregularities and corruption will receive a national reproach," her spokesman, Yoon Chang-jung, said on Tuesday after the presidential pardons were announced. "President Lee should bear all responsibility."

The main opposition Democratic United Party raised suspicions that Ms. Park's criticism of Mr. Lee was insincere and was a political gambit aimed at shielding her from the public backlash over the controversial pardons. In fact, several other politicians pardoned on Tuesday included a close ally of Ms. Park.

"We are appalled by the brazen arrogance, self-righteousness and lack of communication that President Lee is demonstrating till his last day in office," the party's spokesman, Jung Sung-ho, said in a statement. "President-elect Park Geun-hye should be held responsible too for doing nothing to stop the pardons except uttering a few words of criticism."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

NYT > Home Page: Marja Journal: Growing Support for Education in a Volatile Afghan Province

NYT > Home Page
HomePage
Marja Journal: Growing Support for Education in a Volatile Afghan Province
Jan 29th 2013, 06:30

Bryan Denton for The New York Times

A boys' school in Marja has seen steady enrollment since 2010, but like many others in Helmand Province, it is low on supplies and good teachers because of the volatility in the region.

MARJA, Afghanistan — The headmaster of the boys' school in this corner of southern Afghanistan has savored the past three years, a rare run of uninterrupted school terms that filled his classrooms and drew students from miles away.

Map

Students at a boys' school in Marja.

But experience has taught him not to count on the good times lasting long.

Over just 12 years, Abdul Aziz, 50, has seen at least two anti-education governments come and go. He opens his school's doors when the local politics allow it, but with all the volatility he cannot attract good teachers or even wheedle the provincial education department to send him enough books. His school is cold in winter, scorching in summer and ill-supplied year round, but at least it is open.

"When the Taliban came to power in the 1990s we lost a lot of students and a lot people left Marja," he said. "Then in 2002 after the Taliban fled, people came back and the schools reopened until the Taliban came back again in 2006, and then the schools closed. Then we reopened in 2010 when the Marines came."

His school stands as an example of how the American troop surge in Helmand Province improved people's lives in places like Marja, once a stronghold of the Taliban. It also, however, shows the limitations of what can be achieved in rural southern Afghanistan, even with the West's vast resources at work.

A combination of insecurity, logistical hang-ups and corruption most often keeps the schools that do manage to open their doors from being adequately equipped or organized, and many parents are still wary of sending their children to them.

"This is not only the story of Marja — this is the story of all of rural Helmand," said Nasima Niazi, a member of Parliament from Helmand, who taught for years in the province's schools before she ran for office.

Still, there are now 140,000 children registered in the province's schools, according to the provincial education department, which is an astonishing number given that in 2002, when Ms. Niazi started teaching again, there were just 75 students in the high school in Lashkar Gah, the provincial capital.

The situation in Marja is counted as a success, too, though a tenuous one. With 9 out of 15 schools open and 5,000 children attending class, there is no comparison to three years ago. But families here are always ready to pull their children out of class because of ingrained fear of reprisal from the Taliban. That fear lives on despite an effort by some Taliban to improve their image by allowing boys' schools to stay open in several areas of Helmand, said Mohammed Nasim Safi, the head of the provincial education department.

Often, now the barrier is the entrenched anti-education biases among the rural population, Mr. Safi said. Helmand, which is steeped in conservative Pashtun culture, has among the lowest literacy rates in the country with 8 percent of men and far fewer women able to read in contrast to a 43 percent literacy rate for men nationwide, according to rough statistics used by the American military in Helmand.

"Most of the closed schools are either in the areas where the government presence is zero or in areas where people are not interested in education and sending their children to school," he said, noting that of the 336 schools in the province, 185 are open.

State-run education in rural Afghanistan has had a troubled history after a slow and cautious start in the 1950s under the rule of Prime Minister Sardar Mohammad Daoud Khan and Mohammad Zahir Shah, the former king. When the Communists came to power in 1978, they aggressively pushed an education campaign that aroused the wrath not only of country dwellers, but of the mujahedeen, who saw state education as an anti-Islamic, foreign import.

The mujahedeen burned thousands of schools in the 1980s and early 1990s and killed thousands of teachers, according to a report on the development of the Taliban's education policy by the Afghanistan Analysts Network, a research group in Kabul.

When the Taliban came to power in 1996, they violently discouraged both boys and girls from attending school. In 2001, after the invasion by American and allied forces, a renewed emphasis on education again met with derision from rural Afghans, but slowly that has changed. Many parents now desperately want their children to learn to read and write and do math so that they can better help support the family.

Habib Zahori contributed reporting.

A version of this article appeared in print on January 29, 2013, on page A6 of the New York edition with the headline: School Support Grows Even Under Specter Of a Taliban Return.

Media files:
HELMAND-1-moth.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions