Re: [MacBook] IPad vs. Kindle etc.?
I have a nook Color and an IPad 2 and like both for different reasons. The Nook is lighter and small but would never hold a charge for three days. The color version is harder to read in sunlight. I think the IPad is more versatile and you would discover many new uses/features. Have fun.
Lonnie
www.rinniws.com
On May 17, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Michael Maiatico <mjmaiatico@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a Kindle and an iPad 2. I would recommend the iPad 2 or the newest iPad hands down.I don't have the Kindle Fire so I can't speak for it. The Kindle though is easier to read outdoors.The iPad has much better clarity inside. But the number of apps and the flexibility is tremendous! Mike
> To: macbook@yahoogroups.com
> From: botteron@alum.mit.edu
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:22:33 -0400
> Subject: [MacBook] IPad vs. Kindle etc.?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Can someone please point me to a comparison of the iPad vs. Kindle and
>
> similar devices?
>
>
>
> I'll be taking a train ride (3 days each way) and want to be able to read
>
> without lugging lots of books. Not sure whether the train will have wifi
>
> but if I'm somewhere that does, I'd like to be able to check my email.
>
> Apparently some Kindle-like devices have this capability. One question
>
> is which devices can run for 3 days without needing a new charge.
>
>
>
> If I get something that can connect to the net, I'd like to be able to
>
> use it at home too. I have used Macs since the 80s but always with a
>
> modem cable (have DSL now) so I'm pretty clueless about wirelessness.
>
> What would I need to be able to use an iPad/whatever?
>
>
>
> Recommendations of the best new toy, or any suggestions, would be
>
> welcome. adTHANKSvance!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
0 comments:
Post a Comment