Iran’s Leader Rejects Direct Talks With U.S.
Khamenei Official Website, via European Pressphoto Agency
Speaking to air force commanders in Tehran on Thursday, Ayatollah Ali Khameini said Iran "will not negotiate under pressure."
Caren Firouz/Reuters
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Tehran would not be intimidated by Washington.
WASHINGTON
— Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, rejected any idea of
bilateral talks with the United States on Thursday, in a speech in which
he seemed to dismiss the views of Iranian officials — including the
country's foreign minister — who had advocated for such negotiations.
"The
Iranian nation will not negotiate under pressure," Ayatollah Khamenei
said. Noting the international sanctions against Iran, which were
bolstered on Wednesday by new American financial restrictions that
essentially reduce Iran to using its oil for barter trade, he added:
"The U.S. is pointing a gun at Iran and wants us to talk to them. The
Iranian nation will not be intimidated by these actions."
"Direct talks will not solve any problems," he concluded.
His
statement was considered particularly important because, as one senior
Obama administration official put it, "we believe Khamenei now holds the
entire nuclear file."
But the
White House did not immediately react to the statement, and some
officials said that history — including during the Iran-Iraq war —
demonstrates that Iran can change its position quickly. Despite the
ayatollah's comments, it appears that talks scheduled to begin Feb. 26
between Iran and six nations, including the United States, will go ahead
in Kazakhstan.
But American
officials have said repeatedly in recent months that they believe
negotiating in that multinational forum can be awkward, partly because
of differences with Russia and China over Tehran. That is one reason
Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. went to a security conference in
Munich last weekend to publicly reinforce President Obama's private
offer of direct talks.
It was at
that conference that the Iranian foreign minister, Ali Akbar Salehi,
said he was open to such talks, although Mr. Biden noted that they could
proceed only if the ayatollah showed serious interest. Mr. Salehi had
been one of Iran's top nuclear negotiators, and while he has often
projected a moderate tone, he has also made it clear that his authority
is limited. An effort to negotiate a deal early in Mr. Obama's
presidency resulted in an agreement that Ayatollah Khamenei rejected.
The ayatollah's objection is an edict
to which other Iranian officials, including President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, must adhere, and it comes after several high-ranking
Iranian officials, including Mr. Ahmadinejad and Mr. Salehi, said that
the Obama administration had been taking positive steps toward Iran.
Ayatollah Khamenei's wording was quite direct in his speech before air
force commanders at his Tehran office, and his comments were reported on
his personal Web site.
"I'm not a
diplomat; I'm a revolutionary, and speak frankly and directly," he said.
"If anyone wants the return of U.S. dominance here, people will grab
his throat."
He said that while
some "simple-minded people" might be eager for the prospect of bilateral
talks, Iran had seen nothing from the Obama administration other than
conspiracies. Those comments are in accord with American intelligence
assessments of the supreme leader's views, which include, officials say,
a belief by the ayatollah that the sanctions are hurting the United
States more than they are hurting Iran.
Other
officials close to the ayatollah have said in recent days that the real
goal of America's negotiations, the sanctions and the sabotage of
Iran's nuclear facilities is to bring down the Iranian government.
Under the new restrictions on Iranian
oil payments announced Wednesday, when countries still buying Iranian
oil pay for their purchases, the money must be put into a local bank
account, which Iran can use only to buy goods within that country. It is
a way of keeping the money from being transferred to Iran, and the
Treasury Department said on Thursday that it would strictly enforce the
provisions, barring any banks that violate the new sanctions from
conducting transactions with the United States.
In
Tehran, the comments were met with some sense of resignation — and
suggestions that Mr. Obama's openness to negotiation was a ploy,
intended to set international opinion against Iran.
"There
is no room for any optimism," said Hamid Reza Taraghi, an influential
politician. Pointing to the new sanctions, decisions by American courts
to seize Iranian assets and the American support for the opposition in
Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad is Iran's last regional ally, he
said, "We haven't seen anything good from the U.S."
Iran
experts outside the country said they were not surprised that Ayatollah
Khamenei had ruled out dialogue with the United States, given his
longstanding antipathy toward the Americans.
"This
is expected from Khamenei; his ideological view of the United States is
getting in the way," said Alireza Nader, a senior policy analyst at the
Washington offices of the RAND Corporation. "Khamenei may be reluctant
to negotiate — perhaps he does not want to from a weak position — but
his hand is going to get weaker as time goes by."
Trita
Parsi, the author of a critical account of the Obama administraton's
diplomacy with Iran, "A Single Roll of the Dice" (Yale University Press,
2012), wrote in a post Thursday on The Daily Beast that the ayatollah
sees little advantage in breaking the current stalemate.
"As
long as the West does not put offers on the table that meet Iran's
bottom line, the calculation goes, Iran should play for time and seek a
game changer that enables it to set the terms for a deal," he wrote.
"Even though the price of stalling
will be high, the price of failed talks will likely be equally high,
leaving Tehran better off seeking to press the West to improve the deal —
rather than participating in talks that are doomed to fail."
Thomas Erdbrink contributed reporting from Tehran, and Rick Gladstone from New York.
0 comments:
Post a Comment